• 16687_8.17_000014030272XSmall

    The Blackberry Disruption

    Oct 18 • Behavioral Economics, Government, Innovation, Regulation, Thinking Economically • 403 Views

    Last week’s Blackberry blackout saved lives.

    In Dubai, traffic accidents dipped 20%. For Abu Dhabi, the decrease was 40%. Considering that there is approximately 1 traffic accident every 3 minutes in Dubai and a traffic fatality every 2 days in Abu Dhabi, safety soared.

    A fascinating, unintentional experiment.

    The Economic Lesson

    The implications of the Blackberry outage are multiple. Municipal expense, insurance, regulation and privacy are only several of the issues touched by how we use smartphones.

    All though take us to the economic definition of cost. When we choose to use our smartphones everywhere, what are we sacrificing? 

    An Economic Question: Listing costs and benefits, assess the impact of smartphones on our lives.

    No Comments on The Blackberry Disruption

    Read More
  • 16685_7.17.000016954664XSmall

    Another Amazing Entrepreneur

    Oct 17 • Businesses, Demand, Supply, and Markets, Economic Thinkers, Innovation, Labor, Thinking Economically • 524 Views

    From this WSJ description of Jeff Bezos, you can tell he is an amazing entrepreneur. The article is wonderful. Here are some of the facts:

    • Named Cadabra until someone accidentally called it “cadaver,” Amazon was launched in Seattle on July 16, 1995.
    • Founder Jeff Bezos had employees wrapping books on the floor until (he said) an employee had “the most brilliant idea I had ever heard in my life.” Buy tables.
    • Fueled by 10% to 30% discounts, daily volume slowly grew until Yahoo put Amazon on its “What’s Cool” page.
    • Urged to speed through emails when business skyrocketed, the fastest employees could do 12 a minute.
    • Asked about employees sharing ideas, Bezos replied, “No. Communication is terrible.”
    • To minimize “groupthink,” he implemented the “two-pizza team” rule.
    • Bezos recently patented being able to return gifts before receiving them.

    For more about what makes an entrepreneur, you might enjoy reading this Wired, Jonah Lehrer article.

    The Economic Lesson

    Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) said that entrepreneurs propelled capitalism through creative destruction. New ideas destroyed the status quo but led to economic growth. The auto killed the buggy whip. The transistor replaced the vacuum tube. And Amazon has eradicated the large booksellers and transformed publishing.

    An Economic Question: Why do you think the large booksellers like Barnes & Noble would have had difficulty copying with Amazon’s innovations?

    No Comments on Another Amazing Entrepreneur

    Read More
  • shoes, status signals and property rights

    More Sole Rights

    Oct 16 • Behavioral Economics, Businesses, Demand, Supply, and Markets, Developing Economies, Labor, Regulation, Thinking Economically • 472 Views

    Should a musician be happy with file-sharing and piracy? Maybe.

    According to a recent study of counterfeits, certain businesses should welcome “fakes.” The study looked at counterfeit footwear from China. Sold in the U.S., the fakes affected the real thing in 2 ways.

    • For more expensive footwear (knee-high boots were cited), the knock-offs served as advertising.
    • For the least expensive shoes, sales declined because consumers bought the counterfeit instead of the original.

    The connection to music? The author of the footwear study cites the advertising value of piracy and file-sharing in the music industry.

    Here, in “Sole Rights,” and here in “Fashion Rules,” econlife looks at branding.

    The Economic Lesson

    When free trade pact negotiators refer to their TRIPs, they are not talking about traveling. Instead, they are looking at Trade Related Intellectual Property. TRIPs discussions frequently focus on counterfeit products.

    Just like a building–the physical property that a firm owns–so too can businesses claim possession of their brand, their intellectual property. Trade pacts create reciprocal intellectual property rights. They make counterfeit goods illegal for the exporter and the importer. So, TRIPs can diminish the amount of trade-related counterfeit goods.

    An Economic Question: How might 18th century economist David Ricardo (1772-1823) have felt about TRIPs?

    No Comments on More Sole Rights

    Read More
  • 16681_11.11_000012487089XSmall

    Will We Have Enough Food in 2050?

    Oct 15 • Demand, Supply, and Markets, Developing Economies, Economic Debates, Economic History, Economic Thinkers, Environment, Households, Innovation, International Trade and Finance, Thinking Economically • 568 Views

    The world is getting richer. And richer people eat more meat. And the animals they eat consume more food. Also, everyday, the world has more people.

    The bottom line? According to a study from Nature, we have to double the world’s food supply by 2050.

    The good news is that the study’s authors have 5 suggestions for increasing the world’s food supply. The bad news is that they appear not to have taken economics.

    First, the suggestions:

    1. Stop the spread of agriculture. For example, we should not replace forests with farms.
    2. Increase the yield of “underperforming” acreage. Comparing Africa to Illinois, the wheat yield is 1 to 6.
    3. Enhance “cropping efficiency.” Fertilizer and water might be used more efficiently.
    4. Change what we eat. If we eat less meat then we have fewer animals to feed.
    5. Diminish waste. Rich countries throw away a lot. In poor countries food spoils.

    According to NPR, at a recent presentation, one of the study’s authors was asked, “What about economics?” If economic incentives created our plight, then don’t we need new incentives? What, for example, will stop newly affluent consumers in China from eating more meat?

    Here is a past econlife post on feeding the world.

    The Economic Lesson
    Perhaps one of the first environmentalists, Reverend Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) told us in 1798 that population grows geometrically while resource production expands arithmetically. Consequently, resource prices will rise and supply will become increasingly inadequate.

    An Economic Question: For each food supply solution listed above, what incentive would you suggest?

    No Comments on Will We Have Enough Food in 2050?

    Read More
  • The Panama Canal Project Facilitates World Trade.

    The Fabric of Free Trade

    Oct 14 • Businesses, Demand, Supply, and Markets, Developing Economies, Economic Debates, Economic Thinkers, International Trade and Finance, Labor, Macroeconomic Measurement • 511 Views

    The roof of the big-box store near your home could contain fabric that was made in Greensboro, N.C. Transported in rolls that are 12 feet wide and 5,000 yards long, this material is also made in South Korea.

    Until now, U.S. textile firms could compete against a cheaper South Korean product through faster delivery and customer service. Explained by the NY Times, the U.S./South Korea free trade agreement that Congress just passed would eliminate any advantage U.S. firms had created because lower tariffs will mean even lower prices. 

    Here in a past econlife post is more about KORUS (Korean-U.S. Free Trade Agreement). And here, the U.S. government presents the benefits of free trade and details our free trade pacts.

    The Economic Lesson

    Free trade always seems to take us to the visible and the invisible. We can easily identify the lost jobs. However, it is tougher to quantify the jobs created by exports and the money consumers and businesses save from cheaper imports.

    Combining Adam Smith (1723-1790) and David Ricardo (1772-1823), we can see why most economists support free trade. In a factory, Adam Smith says specialize through division of labor. When each worker has a specific task, output multiplies. Increasing output requires bigger markets in order to sell what has been produced.  As mass production enables us to move from local markets to regional specialization to free world trade, as David Ricardo explained, the world benefits. Here is a great econtalk podcast that connects Smith, Ricardo and trade.

    In a 2006 survey, 87.5% of all PH.D members of the American Economic Association said yes to free trade by agreeing that “the U.S. should eliminate remaining tariffs and other barriers to trade.”

    An Economic Question: Would you support free trade if, by subsidizing its exports, a country made it impossible for U.S. firms to compete? Explain.

    No Comments on The Fabric of Free Trade

    Read More