• 15564_4.4_000004478097XSmall

    A History of Financial Regulation

    Apr 4 • Financial Markets, Regulation • 247 Views

    The Plunge Protection Team is composed of the chair of the Federal Reserve, the Secretary of the Treasury, the SEC, and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission.  Officially called the Working Group on Financial Markets, this group was formed after the 1987 stock market crash. As described in a 1997 Washington Post article, its mission has been to monitor and prevent financial crises.

    Proposed financial regulation from the Chris Dodd committee includes creating a Financial Oversight Stability Council that is charged with “identifying, monitoring and addressing systemic risk.” 

    Comments?

    The Economic Lesson

    To see the content of major federal banking and financial regulation during the past century, this link provides a list of laws and their content. It is excellent.

    No Comments

    Read More
  • 15562_4.3_000010345649XSmall

    Social Insecurity

    Apr 3 • Economic History, Government • 256 Views

    Is there a “lock box” with surplus social security funds? Sort of.  

    In 1983,  when we had inadequate funding for the social security program, a commission led by Alan Greenspan suggested extra sources of revenue for a Social Security trust fund. As a result, primarily through higher payroll taxes, more was collected for social security than they needed then and the money was put aside.

    Here is where you can imagine a lock box. Theoretically kept in the lock box, U.S. treasury securities were purchased with the social security surplus. As a result, social security surplus revenue became available to the U.S. government to spend until the social security administration needed the money.  

    Fast forward to now.  In a recent NY Times article, we learned that this year social security benefits exceeded social security revenue.  Because the recession was the likely cause, all should return to normal soon. But what is normal? Normal means that in 2016, the program will face a tipping point and pay-outs will consistently exceed revenue.

    Are you concerned about the future of social security? Comments?

    The Economic Lesson

    Hoping to give “ownership” to all of us, the creators of Social Security designed a universal pay-as-you-go program in 1935. When we “pay-as-you-go”, we are giving today’s workers’ payroll tax dollars to today’s social security recipients.

    1 Comment

    Read More
  • 15560_4.2_000010186118XSmall

    Tall Stories: Height and Success

    Apr 2 • Households, Macroeconomic Measurement • 253 Views

    A recent Daily Mail article about President Sarkozy’s height sensitivity reminded me of studies that relate height to success.  

    But first, some height stats:

    • Nicholas Sarkozy (France): 5’5″
    • Barack Obama (U.S.): 6’2″
    • Angela Merkel (Germany): 5’8″
    • Gordon Brown (U.K.): 5’11”
    • Stephen Harper (Canada) 6’2″
    • Carla Bruni Sarkozy (French first lady): 5’10”
    • Napoleon Bonaparte: 5’6″
    • 39 U.S. presidents were taller than average while 5 were shorter

    A 2004 New Yorker article has wonderful facts about the economic implications of height: 

    • The tallest in Europe, the average male in the Netherlands is 6’1″ and the average female is 5’8″. Consequently, homes, cars, ambulances and clothing need to be redesigned.  Ceilings need to be higher and ambulances need to be longer.
    • Taller men earn more.  One study indicated that an average six footer will earn close to $165,000 more than someone who is 5’5″ during a 30 year period.
    • Historically, as cities grew larger, humans became shorter. Economists theorize that deficient nutrition was the cause.
    • Height corresponds to economic growth. When affluence grows, so too do people.

    The Economic Lesson

    Called anthropometric history, the history of human height has become an economic field of study. Economists use height data to form hypotheses about GDP, national affluence, food consumption, real family income, wages and prices.

    No Comments

    Read More
  • 15558_4.1_000004760445XSmall

    The Ten Best Money Movies

    Apr 1 • Entertainment, Financial Markets, Thinking Economically • 214 Views

    From a Forbes.com, 2006 reader survey, the 10 best money movies:

    1. Wall Street (1987; 35% of votes)
    2. Trading Places (1983; 10% of votes)
    3. The Sting (1973; 6% of votes)
    4. Ocean’s Eleven (1960; 5% of votes)
    5. Boiler Room (2000; 5% of votes)
    6. It’s a Mad Mad Mad World (1963; 4% of votes)
    7. Casino (1995; 4% of votes)
    8. Glengarry Glen Ross (1992; 4% of votes)
    9. The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948; 4% of votes)
    10. American Psycho (2000; 3% of votes)

     

     

     

    No Comments

    Read More
  • Movies and Business

    Mar 31 • Behavioral Economics, Businesses, Entertainment • 270 Views

    Having discovered a paper that explained why American films tend to present a negative view of business, I was especially interested in seeing which films were discussed.

    “Evil” Firms and Capitalists: The Godfather (1972), The China Syndrome (1979), Norma Rae (1979), Wall Street (1987; remember Gordon Gekko?), Robocop (1987),  Pretty Woman (1990), A Civil Action (1998), The Constant Gardener (2005), Michael Clayton (2007), American Gangster (2007)

    Pro-business: Schindler’s List (1993) Jerry Maguire (1996, Tom Cruise) You’ve Got Mail (1998, Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan) Pursuit of Happiness (2006, Will Smith)

    Where would you place Eddie Murphy’s Trading Places? Others you might add?

    My Source: “Wall Street and Vine: Hollywood’s View of Business”

    No Comments

    Read More