Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Amazon

Prices convey information.

What does a price tell you?

Assume that you were going to purchase a GE Advantium 120 microwave oven on Sunday, August 12. Comparing Sears, Best Buy and Amazon’s sellers at 3 a.m., you would have seen, respectively, $899.99, 809.99 and 744.46. At Amazon’s website, the price changed to slightly more than $850 at 5 a.m., it dropped again to their $744.46 low several hours later and then back above $850 at 10 p.m. During that day, Sears kept the same price, Best Buy changed twice and Amazon, 9 times.

Call it dynamic pricing.

The story of dynamic pricing begins with airline deregulation in 1978. American Airlines (although some say Delta) was the first to realize that different classes of passengers were willing and able to pay different fares. Of course they could not ask if someone was planning a vacation or a business trip, but they could snag the business traveler by charging more if the flight was the next day. And so began what they called yield management. Spreading to hotels and cruises, rental car businesses and a host of others, yield management helped many firms increase revenue.

The dynamic pricing version of yield management has the same revenue enhancing goal. As you probably know, all sorts of goods like bicycles, jewelry and detergents are dynamically priced online. One baby clothes vendor changes his prices every 15 minutes because being cheaper than everyone else means he will top the list of price related search results.

But what does this mean? In a market economy, price is a source of information. Prices enable the supply side to assess productivity, to identify cost and to project profits. On the demand side, price can convey quality and affordability. With price changing frequently, the information flow increases.

Or, as one market participant commented, “The long term implication is that a price is no longer a price.”

My sources and other resources: A front page WSJ article, “Don’t Like This Price? Wait a Minute ” was interesting and had this fascinating graphic comparing price changes from Sears, Amazon and Best Buy. In addition, this academic article explains yield management while this more recent study looks at internet dynamic pricing.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Which friction minimizing invention received a patent in 1999?

Amazon 1-Click.

Described by Amazon in their application for patent 5,960,411, the purchaser just hits a button that activates the movement of payment information from “the client system” to the”server system.”

Because 1-Click glides the customer through the purchasing process, it fits Swarthmore Professor Barry Schwartz’s definition of friction-free finance. In a NY Times opinion column, Dr. Schwartz explains that transactional friction can be good and bad. With Amazon, 1-Click can help us save time and energy that we can use productively elsewhere.

Sometimes though, as with the subprime mortgage debacle, too much ease can let us forget the reality of the transaction. When mortgage packages and online “paperwork” eliminated time, effort and friction, the number of transactions multiplied. And the rest is history.

Professor Schwartz concludes by asking us if we would all be better off if we increased financial friction.

The Economic Lesson

A synonym for financial friction is transaction cost. When you call a pharmacy and spend 5 minutes moving through a menu before you can place your order, you have incurred a transaction cost. If an unemployed person has to fill out many forms when applying for a job, he or she has experienced a transaction cost. And, in the former Soviet Union, the everyday transaction cost of standing in line for hours to purchase food and clothing might have led to Communism’s demise.

Much more than friction, 1-Click criticism, expressed in Wired.com, has been about a patent for a payment process.

An Economic Question: What transaction cost have you recently encountered?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16827_5.8_000015887204XSmall

The buggy whip, the typewriter, and now, maybe the independent bookstore?

In a NY Times Op-Ed, author Richard Russo criticized Amazon for business tactics that would harm independent bookstores.  He cited friends who said, “They don’t win unless they destroy their competition…” and called their price check app “invasive and unfair.” He quoted one author who said “…losing independent bookstores would be ‘akin to editing…a critical part of our culture out of American life.’” Or, as a bookstore owner explained, “If you like seeing the people in your community employed, if you think your city needs a tax base, if you want to buy books from a person who reads, don’t use Amazon.” And finally Russo said that Amazon had become “too big to care.”

Responding in a Slate column, journalist Farhad Manjoo focused on the benefits of paying less. Authors sell more books, consumers have extra money to spend locally and the economy enjoys more efficiency. Rather than doing harm, Amazon’s e-publishing and e-reader innovations have expanded the publishing world.

Does the “inefficient” local bookstore deserve preservation?

The Economic Lesson

Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) best explained the march of new ideas as creative destruction. Overcoming resistance from the people and firms who become obsolete, economies grow as innovation replaces existing goods and services.

An economic question: Using the independent bookstore as an example, cite examples of the cost and benefit of “creative destruction.”

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16685_7.17.000016954664XSmall

From this WSJ description of Jeff Bezos, you can tell he is an amazing entrepreneur. The article is wonderful. Here are some of the facts:

  • Named Cadabra until someone accidentally called it “cadaver,” Amazon was launched in Seattle on July 16, 1995.
  • Founder Jeff Bezos had employees wrapping books on the floor until (he said) an employee had “the most brilliant idea I had ever heard in my life.” Buy tables.
  • Fueled by 10% to 30% discounts, daily volume slowly grew until Yahoo put Amazon on its “What’s Cool” page.
  • Urged to speed through emails when business skyrocketed, the fastest employees could do 12 a minute.
  • Asked about employees sharing ideas, Bezos replied, “No. Communication is terrible.”
  • To minimize “groupthink,” he implemented the “two-pizza team” rule.
  • Bezos recently patented being able to return gifts before receiving them.

For more about what makes an entrepreneur, you might enjoy reading this Wired, Jonah Lehrer article.

The Economic Lesson

Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) said that entrepreneurs propelled capitalism through creative destruction. New ideas destroyed the status quo but led to economic growth. The auto killed the buggy whip. The transistor replaced the vacuum tube. And Amazon has eradicated the large booksellers and transformed publishing.

An Economic Question: Why do you think the large booksellers like Barnes & Noble would have had difficulty copying with Amazon’s innovations?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16496_7.17.000016954664XSmall

According to the Seattle Times, in 1996, Amazon’s CEO, Jeff Bezos said, “You have to charge sales tax to customers who live in any state where you have a business presence. It made no sense for us to be in California or New York.” Amazon’s home? Seattle.

Bezos was referring to a 1992 Supreme Court decision that said states could not ask out-of-state retailers with no local physical presence to pay a sales tax. Consequently, Amazon pays sales taxes to Kansas and Kentucky, North Dakota, and Washington because it has stores or offices there. Amazon claims it has no physical presence in California.

Using a broader definition, California disagrees.

Because Amazon has relationships with in-state affiliates that direct business to it, California says that Amazon will owe local sales taxes. Amazon responded by eliminating those affiliate relationships. In addition, Amazon has petitioned California to schedule a June referendum. Once Amazon gets 500,000 signatures, voters can decide whether California can keep its e-commerce tax.

You can see that we have here a much bigger issue. Should e-retailers charge sales tax? Local retailers say Amazon has an unfair advantage. The state of California desperately needs more revenue. On the other hand, as a growth sector of the economy, should e-commerce receive favorable treatment? And, through local taxes, are states obstructing interstate commerce?

The Economic Lesson

Citing the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause, in Quill Corp v. North Dakota, the U.S. Supreme Court sought to limit when states could tax out-of-state businesses. Here, you can see the Court’s decision.

An Economic Question: Referring to opportunity cost, agree or disagree with Amazon’s Los Angeles customers paying an 8.75% tax.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment