Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: American Revolution

Alexander Hamilton must have been worried. In 1790, as Secretary of the Treasury, a troubled economy had become his responsibility. He had a huge federal debt to fund, a banking sector that was distressed, and an economy to stimulate.

Sound familiar?

Hamilton submitted a 3-part report to the Congress for their approval. Focusing on public credit, creating a national bank , and encouraging manufactures to diversify a farming economy, he had a plan for economic independence.

Public credit was crucial. Created by the Revolutionary War, the sovereign debt was primarily owed abroad. Hamilton had to reassure our European creditors that they would get all of the money that was due them. By funding the war debt, he would establish our good credit, a requisite, he believed for sound finance.

Hamilton understood that economic independence actually related to being dependable within a network of interdependence. The Congress and President Washington followed his lead, implemented his ideas, and the rest is history. The U.S. has never defaulted on its sovereign debt.

Sovereign debt is created when a nation sells bonds. Because banks typically purchase these bonds (governments, households and businesses buy them also), the health of the banking sector can be tied to the bonds that banks own. And so, whether we are looking back at the 18th century US, or Greece or Spain today, still manageable sovereign debt remains central to economic independence.

On this July 4, as we celebrate political and economic independence, let’s applaud Alexander Hamilton, the father of our economy.

These articles provide additional facts about how Alexander Hamilton established a national bank,  encouraged manufactures and created public credit. For euro zone sovereign debt concerns, this BBC interactive graphic clearly conveys each nation’s borrowing status.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere

The year was 1800 when a 65 year old, Paul Revere said, “I have engaged to build me a Mill for Rolling Copper into sheets which for me is a great undertaking, and will require every farthing which I can rake or scrape.”

Paul Revere had been a silversmith, a copper engraver, he could make the buckles on your shoes, your teapot, your false teeth, your church bells. He knew George Washington, John Hancock, John and Sam Adams. During the Revolutionary War, he helped produce gunpowder and cannon, he made that midnight ride, and, protected by a military guard, he printed the money that paid for soldiers and supplies (and his own labor).

With $25,000 of his savings (but not the money he printed), and a $10,000 loan from the federal government with 19,000 pounds of copper, he started his copper foundry. After helping to make the first ships for the U.S. Navy, he had to write a “distressed” note to the US government asking for the $25,000 that was overdue.

Whereas in 1800, the US government helped Revere & Sons grow, now it is helping their descendant survive. Yes, the same firm that Paul Revere started and others like it again need government subsidies. New York State, where Revere Copper Products  now resides, is giving the firm cheap electricity. Governments at every level are providing loans, grants, tax breaks, and other kinds of support to help businesses compete against China’s lower cost producers.

An economist might display the story of Revere’s relationship with the government in 1800 and now through one demand and supply graph. You just need to shift your supply curve to the right to show how subsidies lower cost and thereby increase production.

A classic and the source of my information, Esther Forbes’s 1942 biography of Paul Revere is wonderful . For the current Revere Copper Products story, the NY Times presents a good picture of what small manufacturers say they need from government.

This page was edited after it appeared. I changed Tom Hancock to John Hancock because the latter was well known.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16036_6.16_000006078784XSmall

In “Thinking About Capitalism,” economic historian Jerry Z. Muller tells us that 16th and 17th century wars were “decided by whichever government was the first to run out of money.” Astoundingly, the American colonies did not run out of money.

George Washington’s military leadership, Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration of Independence, Ben Franklin, and John Adams (and Abigail) all come to mind when we think about winning the American Revolution. But whom are we forgetting?

Robert Morris.

We had to pay for the war. A new book, Robert Morris: Financier of the American Revolution by Charles Rappleye has just been published. In the review by John Steele Gordon it sounds wonderful. Robert Morris was the man who “corralled stores of blankets, gunpowder, lead and muskets…” for Washington’s Delaware River crossing. When Washington needed money to pay for spies, he went to Morris.

To fund the war, Morris primarily depended on loans at home and abroad. By 1790, the U.S owed $50 million. And yet, we were able to fund it all.

The Economic Lesson

Following Morris’s advice, George Washington appointed Hamilton as his first Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton’s proposals for the debt, a banking system, and manufacturing formed the foundation for our economic growth.

Alexander Hamilton reminds us that debt can be good if paid back promptly. A nation with good credit can repeatedly borrow and then fund necessities with other people’s money.

Hamilton then and Europe today are interesting contrasts for pondering sovereign debt.

 

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment