Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Andrew Jackson

The Congress and the Deficit

The preface to This Time It’s Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly tells us that, “We have been here before.”

During 1837, with Martin Van Buren entering the White House and Andrew Jackson leaving, a depression had begun. Called the Panic of 1837, banks failed, stock markets plunged, investment declined, there were fewer goods imported, fewer businesses were formed and economic activity contracted.

Describing how we felt about Congress, this 1837 excerpt from Nantucket’s Inquirer and Mirror sounds rather familiar.

“…and for the past year, the subject of our national currency has been the prominent theme of discussion. We have some faith in the wisdom of Congress, notwithstanding it has been predicted they will do nothing but talk–that they can do nothing towards extricating the country from the perplexities which, it is now but very evident to the candid in every party, the untoward ‘experiment’ of the last administration has either caused or aggravated.”

Fast forward to 2012 and an April Pew Research Center survey that reported just 1/3 of the American people had a positive opinion of the federal government and 54% of respondents believed that the “federal government is mostly corrupt.” Correspondingly, their January 2012 survey reported that just 23% of Americans have a “favorable opinion of Congress.” By contrast, many of us feel okay about our state and local governments. Still though, a majority of respondents “say their state government is not careful with people’s money (56%), is too divided along party lines (53%) and is generally inefficient (51%).”

And sadly, this Bloomberg headline says, “Telemarketers Get Higher Approval Rating Than U.S. Congress.” The article then continues to describe the results of a Gallup survey that reported stockbrokers and banks also got higher marks than Congress.

Sources and Resources: Here and here you can see more from Pew about our attitude toward government and here is an essay on the Panic of 1837. The 1837 news article excerpt was from page 1b, the August 16 edition of Nantucket’s Inquirer and Mirror.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Have you ever worried that you gave someone the wrong bill–maybe a ten rather than a dollar? With US currency, it is easy to make a mistake. After all, the US dollar bill, the five, the ten, the twenty, the fifty, the one hundred are mostly green, 6″ x 2 /2″, and they all have the Secretary of the Treasury’s signature.

Using Australian currency as an example, one expert suggests that varied size, different colors, user friendliness and durability are the basics of good currency design. With Australian currency, if you move up the currency ladder, from dollars to fives to tens, the notes get larger, maybe a centimeter each time.  In your pocket, you can feel the size of your bills and know what you have. Colorful, the 5 dollar note is sort of lavender, the 10, bluish, 20 is orangy (sometimes called a lobster), 50 is green and yellow (occasionally referred to as the piney because of its pineapple resemblance). Instead of some linen and cotton, the Australians use a plastic-like polymer that lasts 4 times longer.

Being so used to US currency, I wonder if we forget that it is dysfunctional. Or does it not matter because soon we won’t be using paper currency at all?

A wonderful podcast, 99% Invisible was my original currency design source. But for more, this NY TImes discussion from Richard Smith, perfectly describes why we need a newly designed currency and the site, “Room For Debate” looks at other coin and currency issues like the future of the penny and becoming cashless.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (1) Add a Comment