Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Angela Merkel

Pantsuits Convey Power

Today, some thoughts about pantsuits and power.

One scholarly analysis of Hillary Clinton’s pantsuits concluded that they displayed her toughness.

In a Harper’s Bazaar interview, Nancy Pelosi is asked, “How many pantsuits do you have?” Her answer: “I don’t have any idea. Endless.”

According to Business Insider, because Angela Merkel wears the same Bettina Schoenbach pantsuit style everyday in a different color, she might have inspired the recent Greek riots. The reason? Her attire conveys rigidity. (After a state dinner, Ms. Merke gave Hillary Clinton a framed newpaper picture of the 2 of them from the waist down captioned, “Which one is Merkel, which one is Clinton?”)

Candy Crowley and Martha Raddatz both wore traditional black suit jackets when they moderated presidential and vice presidential debates.

Female Supreme Court justices frequently wear pantsuits.

One analysis of female news anchor attire points out, though, that the pantsuit mandate is fading. Seven years ago, Fox anchors started wearing dresses, more make-up and higher heeled shoes. One analyst suggested that as the status of female anchors ascended, they felt sufficiently powerful to dress individually. Still though, an Indiana University study revealed that male viewers forgot the news content (called a cognitive fog!) when delivered by “boldly dressed women.”

Our bottom line? Female participation rates in the US labor force (see below) have skyrocketed during the past 50 years. And yet still, to compete in the workplace, for women more than men, clothing can affect their success.

Sources and Resources: The articles discussing the connection between female empowerment and attire were fascinating. I read about Angela Merkel in Business Insider and WSJ.com,  Hillary Clinton, in this scholarly paper, Nancy Pelosi in Harper’s Bazaar, and got further insight from msmagazine. For the history of what female news anchors have worn, this Washington Post article was excellent.

Women's Participation Rates Have Soared

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

The US is again hitting its debt ceiling.

With a euro zone update on Greece unfolding (they might lease some islands but we’ll get to that in a moment), here is some Greek math that Michael Lewis presents in Boomerang.

Referring to the deficit, during October 2009, the Greek government thought it was 3.7% of GDP. A closer look from a new finance minister soon resulted in a revision to 14%. How could they have been so wrong (assuming the new figure is valid)? They actually had no independent group gathering statistics. Instead, the political party in charge managed the math.

The 2009 Greek deficit (spending minus revenue for one year) was close to 14% of GDP. The Greek debt (the total amount they owed) might have been 114% of GDP. Why could the Greeks borrow so much?

Comparing Greece’s GDP to its deficit is sort of like comparing your income to your mortgage and then having a wealthy uncle who would guarantee what you borrowed. After the Greeks joined the euro zone, their borrowing costs plunged because lenders assumed the Germans would be there to support the loans. Even though the German economy was much healthier than Greece’s, their governments could borrow at similar rates–and those rates were low. As a result, Greece could go on a borrowing spree and use the money to run unprofitable government businesses like the national railway, to pay generous pensions to retired government employees and to ignore nationwide tax evasion.

Now, Greece knows it has to cut the public payroll. A recent Bloomberg article tells us that they are using incentives to encourage retirement and also placing people on 75% pay if they receive a poor evaluation or disciplinary action. However, as one IMF official told Michael Lewis, “I’m all for reducing the number of public-sector employees. But how do you do that if you don’t know how many there are to start with?” (from Boomerang, p. 79).

And finally–why do the Germans and French care about Greek math? Here we have reality. German and French banks hold Greek debt.

For an excellent video from the St. Louis Fed on “The Greek Tragedy,” I recommend this YouTube video and all others from the series. And this Washington Post book review tells more about Michael Lewis’s financial disaster tourism in Boomerang.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment