Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: baby names

Baby Names

Yesterday, I met a 4-year old whose name was Ciela. Her grandmother told me the name, meaning sky or heaven, was selected after a family visit to Spain.

According to 3 University of Chicago researchers, Ciela’s parents wanted to convey a message. Signaling their “cultural capital” to the world, Ciela’s parents are saying that they are educated, creative and cosmopolitan.

If, on the other hand, the little girl’s name was Elizabeth, those researchers would have said her parents were signaling their “economic capital.” Affluent and established, the family is conveying their comfort with simplicity and familiarity.

Looking at names data from California, the Chicago researchers concluded that baby names can reflect a parent’s political bias. Parents who are more liberal could demonstrate their cultural superiority with uncommon names that have obscure significance. For example, they might name their children Franny and Zooey because of J.D. Salinger. They also will select names with a more “feminine feel” and softer sounding letters. However, when conservative parents send their “economic signal,” they use more masculine sounding traditional names with harder consonants and/or fewer syllables.

The perfect example is 4 of (US Vice Presidential Republican candidate) Sarah Palin’s children: Bristol, Piper, Trigg, Track.

By contrast, think of the Obama girls: Sasha and Malia.

In his Theory of the Leisure Class, Thorstein Veblen explains that the upper class signals its power by living extravagantly. Calling expensive purchases conspicuous consumption, he says their primary purpose is a social message. Similarly, the authors of the University of Chicago study believe that baby naming is conspicuous consumption.

Here are some examples:

Liberal

  • Lola
  • Ruby
  • Mia
  • Eliana
  • Thea

(Doesn’t Ciela perfectly fit with the liberal list?)

Conservative

  • Casey
  • McKenzie
  • Jordan
  • Taylor
  • Sarah

 

Sources and Resources:  Hat tip to Freakonomics for their “How Much Does Your Name Matter?” podcast. Covering much more than the University of Chicago study, Dubner and Leavitt also discussed how names affect our ability to get jobs.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

babynames_nametag

By Lilli DeBode, guest blogger, senior at Kent Place School

Replicating a study carried out by the Guardian last month, Gawker created a Venn diagram, (see below), that compares the top 25 baby names of 1994 to the 25 most popular names of current Yale students .

While there were only eight boys names that did not make the cutoff for Yale, 12 of the most popular girl’s names were left in the cold. Seven of the top 12 1994 names didn’t make it on Yale’s list.

So what names are Yale admission officers looking for? Rather than the common “Amanda,” “Nicole,” or “Kayla,” Yale plays it old-school; accepting a plethora of “Elizabeths,” “Victorias,” “Alexandras,” and “Katherines” (names that were up in the 70’s or higher on the 1994 list).

There was one name that was on Yale’s “Top 25” list, but was 185th on the 1994 list. Since then, this name has elbowed its way down to first place to win the title: “Most Popular  Baby Name of 2011.” So kudos to all the parents out there who, 18 years ago, had the insight and sagacity to name your daughter “Sophia,” thus putting her on the path leading straight to Yale’s gates.

Is there any way to predict the next holy grail of baby names? Clearly the current popular names aren’t going to cut it 18 years down the road. Trends show that name popularity travels down the socioeconomic ladder. First, upper class parents name their children an uncommon name, and then it works its way down the chain until it eventually becomes the most popular name of the year. Therefore, Yale-worthy names must be ahead of their time whilst keeping it classy. Here are some suggestions from writer, Blake Flannery, on how to unearth a baby name that might just be the next “Sophia.”

  1. Use a last name as your baby’s first.
  2. Use names that were popular when your grandparents or greatgrandparents were named.
  3. Look for less popular names from the Bible.

 

original

Sources and Resources: To read Gawker’s analysis of their Venn diagram, click here. For more incredibly interesting information about the economics of baby naming and how to give your baby a classy name, click here.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment