Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: bankruptcy

Home to the Miami Heat, the American Airlines Arena is hosting the NBA finals. Last year, American Airlines declared Chapter 11.

Is it the “stadium curse?”

In 2000, for $100 million, Enron bought the naming rights to the home of the Houston Astros for 30 years. Two years later, when Enron imploded, the Houston Astros bought back the contract for $2.1 million.

Last month, the Houston Dynamo soccer team held a ribbon cutting ceremony for their newly named BBVA Compass Stadium. BBVA is the US subsidiary of the largest bank in Spain, the bank that recently had an $8.3 billion euro capital shortfall. (Does that mean that any European bailout money BBVA might get will go to Houston??)

Others who have suffered the “stadium curse?” The Journal of Sports Economics includes in its list:

Sponsors, Stadiums and Situations

Firm Stadium City “Difficulty”
CMGI CMGI Field Boston Financial “distress”
Conseco Conseco Fieldhouse Indianapolis Bankruptcy
MCI MCI Center Washington, D.C. WorldCom (parent company) bankruptcy
National Car Rental National Car Rental Arena Miami ANC (parent company) bankruptcy
TWA Trans World Dome St. Louis Bankruptcy
US Airways US Airways Arena Landover, MD Bankruptcy

From “A Stadium by Any Other Name: The Value of Naming Rights,” Journal of Sports Economics, pp. 581-595, December 2007, by E.M. Leeds at al.

No doubt, firms believe a naming opportunity enables them to support a community, get a stream of positive publicity and enjoy the benefits that accompany beng associated with a stadium. However, Michael Leeds, a sports economist from Temple University believes that typically, as a competitive strategy, there is no impact on profitability. Leeds presents his research here. And for more on the “stadium curse,” this Bloomberg article discusses BBVA and the Houston Dynamo, marketplace.org interviews Michael Leeds, and BusinessInsider presents a history and stadium pictures.

And finally, you might enjoy these college stadium names.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16592_1.11_000013695977XSmall

We could call it a double pay-off. Subsidized by stimulus spending, Solyndra could create jobs and develop “green” technology. But it did not work out that way.

According to the Washington Post and the NY Times, solar panel maker Solyndra got a $527 million stimulus-related loan from the US Treasury and an Energy Department loan guarantee. With total sales near $250 million at the end of 2010, the firm employed about 1000 people. Now though, they need bankruptcy protection and are stopping production.

Inexplicably, a Department of Energy representative said, “The project that we supported succeeded. The facility was producing the product it said it would produce, and consumers were buying the product.”

Here, an econlife post looks at how government is subsidizing electric car manufacture.

And here is another post on solar panels.

The Economic Lesson

When government subsidizes business, it affects the supply curve. Upward sloping, the supply curve shifts to the right because money from government cheapens the cost of production. As a result, it crosses the downward sloping demand curve at a lower point, and equilibrium price drops.

Even with the subsidy and supply shifting to the right, U.S. made solar panels are more expensive than China’s.

An Economic Question: Do you believe that the US government should subsidize an industry and a technology that it wants to encourage or should it let the market system make the decision?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment