Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Continental Airlines

16570_3.15a_000002547262XSmall

What to do when one airline uses a potent Starbucks bean, the other a weak Fresh Brew blend and they merge? After 14 months, Continental and United finally decided.

Described in Bloomberg Businessweek, our story starts with a 14 member beverage committee and 12 different beans. After sampling each one, they selected a light roast from Fresh Brew that company executives and more than 1,000 flight attendants also liked. On July 1, passengers were served the new coffee.

Then the problems began. Continental’s fliers objected to the watery blend, United’s loyalists wanted weaker coffee, and United’s onboard coffee equipment leaked extra water into the pot when the new pillow packs were brewing. Told about “howls of protest,” the beverage committee re-assembled and started all over again.  This time they chose a medium roast. If you fly United on March 1, you will be one of the first to sample it.

And this was just the coffee!

Combining 2 airlines is a monumental task. Everything from technology to uniforms are debated. Having merged 6 years ago, US Airways and America West have not completed the details. As for the Delta/Northwest combination, which began in  2008, they still are not done.

Illustrating everything from mergers to industry leaders to departures, this interactive graphic wonderfully displays changes in the airline industry since 1990.

The Economic Lesson

Brewing 62 million cups of coffee a year because of the merger, the new United has achieved more cost efficiency when it buys beans. Because “legacy” carriers like United and Continental are burdened by higher costs, they have had to merge to compete against Southwest and other discount airlines.

An Economic Question: After the airline industry was deregulated in 1978 how did competition change flying? This article provides some facts.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15525_3.15a_000002547262XSmall

New rules might not always have the results regulators expect.  Starting on April 29, any airplane that sits on the tarmac for longer than 3 hours will be fined up to $27,500 per passenger.  For a Boeing 737, that could mean $4 million.  Continental’s CEO responded, “Here’s what we’re going to do: We’re going to cancel the flight.” And Delta and Jet Blue, concerned about a closed runway at New York’s JFK, asked for temporary exemptions.  The goal of the rule? To help passengers.  The result? Perhaps canceled flights that do more harm than good.

Here, let’s think economically.  The primary goal of every business is to maximize profits.  If large fines seem imminent, firms will try to avoid them.  It appears that the Continental reaction is not what the DOT had in mind.  Still, we cannot be sure of the airlines’ profit maximizing response until after April 29.

The Economic Lesson

Thinking of the impact of a new rule returns us to incentives.  The incentives that new rules create will determine their success.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment