Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: David Ricardo

The Panama Canal Project Facilitates World Trade.

When a desk destined for Ohio leaves China on a super-sized container ship, should it enter the US in LA or NY?

The Panama Canal could determine the answer.

Imagine a jagged north south line dividing the US. Located somewhere between the East and West Coast, the line determines where supertankers carrying Asian cargo will dock. All places to the east of the line will receive goods from NY/NJ or maybe Savannah or Charleston. On the west side of the line, maybe Los Angeles or Oakland.

But here is where it gets interesting. The position of the line relates to cost. And that is where the Panama Canal’s renovation enters the picture. In 2015, ships that had been too big for the canal will be able to pass through and head for the East Coast. Cargo that had gone to congested West Coast ports like Los Angeles will have a less expensive alternative. Choosing the cheaper destination, they will nudge that jagged north south demarcation line westward.

Seeing that line move, eastern ports (please see below) are preparing for more business. Savannah Georgia has a river to deepen 6 feet while Bayonne NJ has to raise a bridge 64 feet. Sort of like the butterfly effect where a flutter can make a difference half a world away, the yet to be finished Panama Canal project is creating jobs, environmental concerns, new distribution patterns, and countless other big and small responses as it ripples around the world.

As James Gleick says in Chaos...

  • For want of a nail, the shoe was lost;
  • For want of a shoe, the horse was lost;
  • For want of a horse, the rider was lost;
  • For want of a rider, the battle was lost;
  • For want of a battle, the kingdom was lost!”

And so…LA or NY for that Asian cargo? Much more than we might imagine relates to that decision.

Our bottom Line: As the first person to explain comparative advantage, 19th century economist David Ricardo (1772-1823) would have been delighted that the Panama Canal was facilitating world trade.

Sources and Resources: At econlife, we have looked at the Panama Canal project here and here, but this Businessinsider article and the Transportation Nation blog had interesting new facts that led me to the more scholarly considerations in this 2008 US Army Corps of Engineers Panama Canal paper.

Bigger than the panamax container ships, this post-panamax will be able to move through a deeper wider Panama Canal.

The Post Panamax will be able to navigate the Panama Cana after its renovation.

From the 2008 US Army Corps of Engineers Panama Canal paper:

Ports Will Have to Widen Channels and Raise Bridges Because of Larger Container Ships

 


Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Is It Better to Outsource or Insource T-shirts?

Hearing about an apparel firm that “insourced,” I confess I was not as enthusiastic as the report.

The firm, American Giant, had just enjoyed a run on their hoodies. As a Made in the USA producer, they have the caché of a San Francisco factory. Proclaiming better grommets, eaglets, drawstrings and zippers and a designer previously employed by Apple, American Giant says their quality is far better than their Asian competitors.

Looking at the NPR facts and other similar articles, I wondered whether making t-shirts and sweatshirts in the US was so beneficial. Yes, they were taking advantage of US expertise, eliminating middle people and selling directly online to consumers to cut costs. However, should we applaud making apparel here?

That took me to a Brookings Report that appeared to be on target. They asked “Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters?” And no, it is not in the apparel industry.

The Brookings report emphasized that manufacturing provides:

  • high wage jobs
  • innovation
  • exports
  • environmental sustainability

 

But not all manufacturing. The industries that reap the largest gains are:

  • computers and electronics
  • chemicals (including pharmaceuticals)
  • transportation equipment (including autos, auto parts and aerospace)
  • machinery

Our bottom line? Hoping to encourage global trade, economist David Ricardo (1772-1823) said each nation should produce the goods and services for which it has a comparative advantage because then, that nation sacrifices less in order to produce more.

Sources and Resources: You might want to look at the Brookings report here. 53 pages long, it has lots more detail. Meanwhile, the American Giant stories at Slate and NPR sounded more like commercials for the firm than news reports. Finally, at econlife, whenever we talk about manufacturing, I always recommend The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy, a wonderful narrative describing the multinational origins of the typical t-shirt.

From the Brookings Report on manufacturing, the following graphs illustrate their conclusion that manufacturing should be supported by public policy.

Typical Manufacturing Workers Earn More.

 

Most R&D Originates in Manufacturing

Losses and Wages in Manufacturing Jobs, 2001-2009

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Invention, Profit and Economic Growth

Saying that profit, not necessity is the mother of invention, economic historian John Steele Gordon starts his column in this week’s Barrons. His focus was the 18th century clipper ships that earned people like John Jacob Astor $50,000 for a single voyage between the US and China. Furs went to China, tea returned and, because of the invention of the clipper ship, the voyage was faster than ever before.

More speed, more trips, more profits.

The Gordon column reminded me of a book I always enjoy rereading. In How We Got Here, Andy Kessler looks at a history of technology and markets. Echoing Gordon, Kessler takes the reader through the history of the steam engine. He begins with 18th century English coal mines that flooded because they were below water level. Realizing miners needed something better than their vertical bucket brigade, Thomas Savery invented the Miner’s Friend, a steam powered mechanized pump.

Here we can fast forward, from the first steam engines to the steamboat (yes, there is lots in between). But that gets us back to the clipper ship and again, how the quest for profits leads to invention. When steam power became cheap enough, because of their speed and cargo capacity (10 times more than sailing vessels), steamboats replaced clipper ships. Merchants, whose transport costs could run as high as three-quarters of the price of an exported good, saw their opportunity.

Again, more voyages, higher volume, lower prices, bigger profits and soon, the next invention.

Wouldn’t Adam Smith (mass production) and David Ricardo (free trade) both be smiling?

Sources and Resources: Happily, here you can easily take a look at the Kessler book (my source for steamship stats) while the Gordon article is here. For good brief bios on Smith and Ricardo, the econlib library, here and here, is a handy link.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

US Chicken Paw Exports to China

Yesterday’s headlines about the US taking China to the World Trade Organization (WTO) for unfair auto and auto parts subsidies took me to chicken feet and The Economist’s Sinodependency Index. Knowing the major firms that depend on China for revenue might help us further assess our relationship.

Approximately 20 years ago, chicken paws, used primarily for animal feed, were worthless. Now though, with Perdue producing more than a billion chicken feet a year, paw exports annually return $40 million in revenue. The reason is China.

A delicacy in China, chicken feet are a perfect U.S. export. US chickens are fat and juicy because we grow big chickens. In addition, their “natural scarcity” (only 2 per chicken) bestows some prestige on diners who order them.

Similarly, Intel, Apple, IBM and GE generate considerable revenue from China. Called a Sinodependency Index, The Economist displayed the relative revenue dependence on China of 135 firms in the S&P 500. Their goal was to show the extent to which China has woven its presence within the fabric of world trade.

Although some of their statistics were rough because of each firm’s revenue breakdown, The Economist believed that their Index conveyed the information effectively. In a copy of their chart below (interactive with percents if you visit their site here), you can see their color coding for industry and size coding for how a firm’s revenue compared to the other 134 in the index. The top 10 in their list, in size order, are: Intel, Apple, IBM, GE, Caterpillar, Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Yum Brands, Philip Morris, Boeing.

As economists, we could not conclude without mentioning comparative advantage. First explained by 19th century economist David Ricardo, comparative advantage says that worldwide productivity increases when nations specialize and export the good or service for which they sacrifice the least to make. But, what to do when a nation employs unfair trade practices like subsidizing their exports to make them cheaper and adding duties to imports to make them more expensive?

My Sources and Resources: A wonderful podcast and post from Freakonomics was the source of my chicken feet facts while you can look directly at The Economist’s Sinodependency chart, their article and a link to the math behind the Index here. For more on the current trade dispute in the World Trade Organization (WTO), here is one article from Bloomberg. And here, this EconLife post presents more on a past trade dispute with China that involved chicken paws and is the source of 2 sentences in this entry.

Trade Dependency on China From the Economist

135 Firms From S&P 500: Revenue From China from the Economist

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

The Panama Canal Project Facilitates World Trade.

To introduce our first international trade discussion in class, I usually ask students to check where their clothing and shoes have been made. Finding labels that say “Made in China, Made in Thailand, Made in Peru…,” they first see how trade touches them.

Then though, the surprises begin.

U.S. businesses benefit considerably. For a $70 pair of sneakers that was Made in China, a 2011 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco report tells us that transport, wholesale and retail expenses involving US businesses represented 55% of the selling price. As a result, the US truck driver, the US store owner, the US wholesaler and retailer all received some income because of those Chinese sneakers.

US consumers also enjoy benefits from the “Made in China” label. In “The Fruits of Free Trade” from the Dallas Fed is a chart that conveys the trajectory of prices for traded and non-traded goods from 1997 to 2002. For traded goods like video equipment, TV sets and toys, prices plunged while the non-traded goods had price increases. On the flip side, when jobs are protected, the consumer suffers. For apparel and textiles, when trade barriers saved 168,786 jobs, the cost to consumers was $199,241 per job.

So, when 9 Senators introduce legislation to mandate “Made in the USA” Olympic uniforms, they are making a political statement but ignoring the economic realities.

Intuitively though, it is tough to grasp why legislators suggesting home industry might be harming the US economy. Nineteenth century economist David Ricardo first explained the classic defense of world trade through the law of comparative advantage. Basically, he told us to optimize world efficiency and incomes by  ”Doing what we do best and then trading for the rest.” Much more recently, in “Ricardo’s Difficult Idea,” Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman tried to explain why many people have ignored the wisdom of David Ricardo’s ideas.

To read more about the merits of free trade the Federal Reserve reports are here and here while a good bio of David Ricardo is here. You might also want to read this report from Michael Mandel that looks at how we might regain any jobs lost from trade.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment