Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: developed nations

Small Dogs Like Pomeranians are Typical in Brazil

Chloe and Gus, my daughter’s miniature Pomeranians, consume organic dog food and use wee-wee pads, they visit the vet, the groomer, and enjoy their treats and toys. Because of Chloe and Gus, my cats, and the dogs in 1 out of every 4 households in the US, we have a growing pet industry.

I started listing the discretionary spending that supports Chloe and Gus after reading about the Euromonitor Dog Index for 53 countries. Here are some facts that connect pooch spending to prosperity:

Averaging one dog in every 4 households, the US has the world’s largest pooch population. But Norway does the most per capita pup spending at $639 while Switzerland and Australia ranked 2 and 3.

In the developing world, Brazil, with a more affluent urban population, has the most small dogs per capita. But the biggest proportional increase in dog ownership was led by India, and then the Philippines, Venezuela, Russia, and Argentina. Still though, while dog ownership in India rose 58% during the past 5 years, they have only 4 dogs per thousand people. By contrast, dog ownership in the Middle-East is much less popular. In Saudi Arabia and Egypt, with only 2 dogs for every thousand people, dog ownership is rare and typically relates to big dogs and security.

Finally, the financial woes in the euro-zone appear to have affected dog ownership. France, with a sagging economy and Greece, on the brink of economic cataclysm, have fewer dogs than 5 years ago.

Our bottom line: Chloe and Gus are much more than family dogs. Dog ownership can be an indicator of a country’s economic growth and decline.

Sources and Resources: My facts on dogs are primarily from the Atlantic article and from a marketplace.org report. You might also enjoy this Bloomberg article on a NJ legislative proposal for mandating doggy seat belts and Governor Christie’s response. Finally, these econlife links look at aspirational purchases in the developing world.

 

This chart is from the Atlantic article cited above.

Dogs Per Household Can be an Economic Indicator

 

Please note that this post’s conclusion was edited after it appeared.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (1) Add a Comment

Olympic Medal...olympics_000019262071XSmall

If you want to predict Olympic medal winners, you might look at economic data.

A report on the Olympics from Goldman Sachs suggests that nations with a superior economic growth environment will increase their share of Olympic gold medals in London. Quantifying political, macroeconomic and microeconomic conditions, macroeconomic stability, human capital and technology, Goldman compared economics and medals for multiple years.

Their results?

Predictably, developed nations win more. But also, for less developed nations, increasing per capita income means more medals as does being a host nation. Below you can see the boost predicted for the UK.

In addition, some sports correlate more closely to the economic variables than others. The Goldman researchers concluded that “canoeing, diving, fencing, swimming, table tennis,” equestrianism, gymnastics and wresting have an economic connection. By contrast, football, softball and triathlon have not.

Olympics Medal Statistics and Predictions from the Goldman Olympics Report

Country

GDP Size

By Rank

2011

Olympic

Medals

By Rank

Beijing

2008

Number of

Olympic

Gold Medals

Beijing

2008

Number of

Olympic

Gold Medals

Predictions

2012

USA

1

1

36

37

China

2

2

51

33

Japan

3

9

9

8

Germany

4

6

16

14

France

5

6

7

14

Brazil

6

13

3

6

UK

7

4

19

30

Italy

8

8

8

10

Russia

9

3

23

25

Canada

10

12

3

6

*Australia had 15 gold medals in 2008; 14 is the Goldman prediction for this year.

Fun to contemplate, the predictions vary. You might enjoy looking at the Goldman report, these WSJ predictions and this comparison of several. For another economic analysis of Olympic medal winners from a Colorado College professor, I suggest looking at Dan Johnson’s predictions.  And for per capita income data, this World Bank site is ideal. Finally, I wonder how much the euro zone fiscal turmoil has affected Olympic budgets. I have read that Greece’s Olympic spending has plummeted.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16704_10.29.11.world pop_000003701022XSmall

Imagine for a moment 3 groups of countries, each with a different population pyramid. The first has a huge bulge at the bottom, the second is wider in the middle and the third is relatively broad at top.

If this represents the world in 2025, what can we expect?

This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report tells some of the story:

3 Groups: We can start by dividing the world into the more developed, less developed and least developed nations. The more developed world would include most of Western and Eastern Europe, New Zealand, Canada, Japan.  In the middle group, we could list many Latin American countries like Brazil and Argentina and then traveling to Africa, Kenya would be one, in Asia, India of course, and in the Pacific, Indonesia. For the least developed countries, Ethiopia, Uganda, many other African nations, and Haiti and Samoa are examples. (In the CBO report, the U.S. and China were presented separately.)

3 Demographic Stages: Next, we can assume that each group undergoes 3 demographic stages after centuries of high mortality and fertility rates. 1) Benefiting from modern technology and health care advances, at first, they experience higher birth rates and more children survive.  2) Then, as these larger numbers of children become young adults, they have fewer children than the previous generation. 3) Finally, as the larger cohort ages, they inflate the elderly population. Here, depending on the country, you can see how timing might vary.

3 Population Pyramids: This takes us to 3 population pyramids. For stage 1, the population bulge is at the bottom of the pyramid, stage 2, in the bottom and middle, and stage 3 at the top. Illustrated in this World Economic Forum report (p. 29), you can see the projected placement of the bulge for the 3 groups during 2025.

The Economic Lesson

3 Economic Implications: During Stage 1, countries experience less economic growth because more resources are used for their children. They are concerned with “youth dependency.” When those children survive, during Stage 2, they compose a larger group that works, saves and contributes to economic growth. Stage 3, though, creates new challenges when the bulge in the population no longer is in the labor force, consumes more than they produce, lives longer, and has to be sustained by a relatively smaller labor force. We could say that countries at the third stage  have an elevated “old age dependency” rate to manage.

An Economic Question: For the United States, as the baby boomers age and rise to the top of the population pyramid, how will Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid be affected?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment