Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: double dip

Ice cream stores

We do not know whether a double dip has begun. Cascading during 2008 and the first half of 2009, the GDP then began to climb. Only if it drops again will we have a double dip. In the NY Times, financial journalist Floyd Norris does a beautiful job of comparing the 1980/82 double dip with now.

1980-82:

In 1980, inflation was the culprit. But then, attempts to control rising prices by restraining consumer credit so diminished economic activity that policy makers reversed course. Growth resumed but so too did inflation.

Responding, the new Fed chair, Paul Volcker, tried some politically unattractive economic discipline. Strangling lending, percent by percent, the Fed raised interest rates until the prime touched 21.5%. By 1982, we had a new recession. Still though, with inflation his target, Volker’s interest rate arsenal took aim until he was successful. By 1984, inflation was down to 4.1% from 13.6% and GDP was growing at a 7.2% rate.

2011:

Now, like 1980, government’s initial policies are not curing our economic ailments. We still face a housing problem, we still lack robust expansion, we still have high unemployment. Perhaps, like 1980, government might need to resort to more unattractive economic discipline because it has used up the more appealing weapons in its economic arsenal.

Maybe, also like 1980, we face the threat of a double dip. Here, you can listen to Merle Hazard sing “Double Dippin.”

The Economic Lesson

A recession is the period between a peak in economic production and its trough. Imagining a “u”, it is the left side, the trip downward. In economic terms, as we travel down the left side of the “u”, the GDP is either growing more slowly or actually diminishing. While most of us say that a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of declining GDP, the NBER tells us that the quarters do not have to be next to each other.

An Economic Question: Looking at the data in Table B-4, here, in The Economic Report of the President 2011, since 1980, how many recessions has the U.S. experienced?

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16406_6.2_000013669809XSmall

We have a double dip in U.S. housing prices. But, is it happening everywhere? A Goldman Sachs research report from mid-May provided an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) summary.

  1. The most troubled: Struggling euro zone countries remain the most distressed. Housing prices in Ireland, Spain, Greece, the Netherlands and Italy have continued to slide.
  2. Moderately declining: The U.S. falls into this category as well as Denmark, Korea, and many euro-area countries.
  3. Rebounding: Canada, Norway, and Australia have experienced double digit increases. Less robust but still rebounding, housing prices in France, Germany, and New Zealand have been going up.
  4. Steadily rising: There actually were countries that sidestepped the housing bubble cataclysm. Switzerland and Belgium have not seen any meaningful drop in prices and now, they continue to rise.

The Economic Lesson

How might a supply and demand graph illustrate the U.S. moderate decline in the housing market? The key is our equilibrium price, the point where the demand and supply curves meet.

What is making this point move downward? Is it a shift in the demand curve because government policy is no longer fueling demand? Or, is it the supply curve sliding downward because of an ever increasing number of houses that people offer to sell each time prices appear to rise?

An Economic Question: Using this Washington Post graphic of housing prices in 12 cities, create your own story of how the housing bubble popped in different places.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15851_8.28_000006219771XSmall

For a smile, you might want to watch Merle Hazard’s “Double Dippin’” song. As the Guardian points out, also look for the fun trivia such as a small background picture of mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot.

No one was smiling, though in response to the 1.6% GDP revised growth rate for the second quarter. Thinking of future economic growth, economist Ed Yardeni, suggests three possibilities in a recent newsletter.

1) The contrarian view says the economy will boom. To generate a 3% growth rate, we would need more housing refinancing that would put money in consumer’s pockets and elevate consumer spending. Also, lower mortgage rates coud lead to more housing sales. Add to this solid corporate profits and higher real pay per worker because of productivity gain and you have a robust recovery. Most say the chances of a robust recovery are slim.

2) More and more people are concerned about a bust which takes us to the double dip scenario. The second dip would be caused by unimproved unemployment and plummeting consumer spending.

3) Muddling with ups and downs in different sectors is the third and most likely alternative. Muddling would be characterized by some employment gains, some housng improvement, some consumer spending.

A (trick) question: If the growth rate has moved from 3.7% down to 1.6% between  the first and second quarter of 2010, then has the economy contracted? The answer: No. The economy continues to grow but at a slower rate.

The Economic Lesson

Let’s think of a double dip as a “W”. The U.S. has experienced 2 double dips during the past 80 years. Looking between 1930 and 1940, economic activity contracted 1930-1933, expanded 1934-1937, dipped in 1938, and then steadily grew. A much faster double dip happened between 1980 and 1982. 1980/down; 1981/up; 1982/ down.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment