Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: economic change

Downton Abbey Maids

Like a business affected by a structural change in the economy, the world was shifting downstairs at Downton Abbey.

The “business” was run by Mr. Carson, the butler, and Mrs. Hughes, the head housekeeper, while Daisy, the scullery maid, was at the bottom. The names provide a clue. Last names are for those at the top and the head housekeeper, married or unmarried, would always have the Mrs. precede her name.

As for the job, in Gosford Park, Helen Mirren explains, ….I’m the perfect servant. I know when they’ll be hungry and the food is ready. When they’ll be tired and the bed is turned down. I know it before they know it themselves. …I’m the perfect servant. I have no life.”

These 12 Downton Abbey servants were a part of a larger staff that would have been close to 25.

These 12 Downton Abbey servants were a part of a larger staff that would have been close to 25.

Specifically, the servants could have been working between 6:00 am and 10:30 at night. From stoking the early morning fires, taking tea and toast to the lady of the house in her room, helping her dress and do her hair, shaving and dressing the lord, morning breakfast for all at 9 or so, then lunch, tea, formal dinner and that’s just the food. There were chamber pots to empty, guests to oversee, the stable, the cars, the pantry…and more.

Ranging from £80 to £16, the staff’s wages were low but they did receive tips from guests and their food and lodging. Trying to figure out what £50 meant in 1901, I discovered that a typical male teacher in Great Britain earned £150-£200 and a female teacher, £112-£117. By contrast, a British constable earned just £72.80. I also found that these 1901 wages might have risen by 5% in 1912 when Downton’s Season 1 began.

Interesting that the chef earns more than the butler. See see a dollar equivalent, just multiply pounds by

To calculate a 2002 dollar equivalent for the 3rd column, just multiply British pounds by 1.45.

 

Each bell was connected to an upstairs room.

Each bell was connected to an upstairs room.

Again, just like upstairs, the elephant in the closet is the economy. With a new world of self-flushing toilets and refrigerators that made servants less necessary and of new industries and shops requiring clerical and unskilled labor, the downstairs staff had less reason to remain. In an NPR interview, the series creator and writer, Julian Fellowes, explains that it is only the older servants like Carson who are horrified by thoughts of life beyond Downton Abbey. Gwen, the maid from Season 1 who left to become a typist was only the beginning.

Sources and Resources: This Fresh Air Terry Gross podcast interview of Julian Fellowes provides wonderful insight about the series and its relationship to his life, family and past and future work. My Helen Mirren quote came from Fellowes’s discussion of Gosford Park. For wage information and my chart, I went here and here. Also, for excellent facts about the British economy and servants’ lives, this Economist article, this Daily Mail article, and this blog were ideal.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

British Aristocracy

When Matthew Crawley, the new son-in-law investor/savior of Downton Abbey is invited to look at the books after handing over his inheritance to keep the financially sinking estate afloat, he discovers egregiously poor management. He also finds out that his father-in-law, Robert, Earl of Grantham really does not care.

Horrifying?

Not at all. The Lord’s attitude was the norm. Business was for the nouveaux riches. For the aristocracy, it was crass.

Perhaps “tradition” sums it all up. Preserve the past. Serve in the royal courts and politics. Entertain. Maintain your London Palace and your country estate. I have to mention windows here. One of the largest British estates, Wentworth House, had 1000 windows (365 rooms). Imagine just keeping the windows clean?

And here we have the inherent conflict. While the cost was massive, the attitude toward making money was, at best, condescending.

After an 1870s pinnacle, the British aristocracy started to struggle. With agricultural rents steady from 1800 to 1936, expenses skyrocketed. Then, add to these rising maintenance costs, “death duties” that, starting in 1894 were 8% and by 1939 rose to 60%. Meanwhile, during World War I, not only did servants leave for the battlefields but also, with a traditional duty to serve, so too did the upper classes. But, at 1 in 5, the upper class endured more fatalities. At home you have rationing and skeleton staffs. No more sugar and cream for the swan ice cream sculptures that climaxed sumptuous meals and not enough people to make them.

For some, the solution lay across the ocean. Sell your paintings to Newport robber barons. Marry American wealth. Including Consuela Vanderbilt with a $2.5 million dowry for the Ninth Duke of Marlborough, in 1895, 9 American heiresses married British aristocracy. At approximately the same time, Lord Grantham married Cora, the daughter of Isidore Levinson, a Cincinnati dry goods millionaire.

But the fix was only temporary.

Struck by the perfect storm of change, each character in Downton responds. The Lord and his daughter Mary resist while her husband, Matthew, embraces the new world. Mary’s sister Sybil marries their former chauffeur, an Irish rebel, and it appears that the third sister, Edith, will become a feminist journalist.

At Downton Abbey, the elephant in the closet is the economy. Resembling a seismic shift, the economic plates that underpinned the English aristocracy were reshaping the landscape and transforming the lives of everyone who lived upstairs.

Tomorrow, we look at downstairs.

Sources and Resources: A great read, this Vanity Fair article by Charles Spencer, the Ninth Earl Spencer, provides all you want to know about the lives and demise of the British aristocracy. For some specifics on those ice creams swans, you could look at this NPR segment, and The Economist provides some good insight about remaining attitudes toward wealth in Europe.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment