Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Fisker Automotive

twins...back to back figures16582_6.30_000005521931XSmall

Our story begins with M.I.T.’s lithium-ion battery research and then takes us to South Korea and China where the batteries are made. Next, in a surprising move, some of the manufacturing returns to the U.S. With $375 million in federal stimulus money and matching state grants, a battery maker, A123, decides to reproduce its Korean facility in Michigan.

And therein lies the dilemma…

Is government the solution or the problem?

Is Government the Solution?

Predicting a 5% electric car market by 2016 and orders for $14 billion of lithium-ion batteries, many people say domestic manufacture is a natural. It represents a “double pay-off.” You get jobs (about 350 per factory) and green. Government’s $2.5 billion support for advanced battery technology will lead to an industrial commons. Only then can manufacturing springboard further research, new industries, and a battery ecosystem in which scientists, mining companies, contractors, designers, engineers, and machine operators interact.

Is Government is the Problem?

Some say we need $7 a gallon gas to make people switch to a plug-in electric hybrid car. Until then, it will be a niche market that exists because of government incentives throughout the supply chain. As we describe in a past post, A123 suppplies Fisker Automotive, a hybrid car-maker that received loans from the Department of Energy. Stimulus dollars and state grants created the incentive to move a lithium-ion battery maker from Korea to Michigan. At the dealership, a Chevy Volt buyer can receive a government subsidy that reduces the price of a car from $41,000 to $33,500. With so much government funding, one industry participant predicts, “a lot of plants, and we will create overcapacity, and a lot of the companies will fail.”

Your decision?

The Economic Lesson

As George Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton wrote an economic development plan through which he sought a diversified economy with agriculture and manufacturing. For Hamilton, government was central to encouraging industrial development as the U.S. market economy grew. Today again, we are asking whether we need government to encourage manufacturing.

Here, in a past post, is another example of U.S. innovation becoming Asian manufacturing.

An Economic Question: Using lithium-ion battery manufacture as your factual example, do you believe government provides the solution for our economic future or creates a problem?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16250_3.16_000007427834XSmall

The Fisker Karma car has 2 electric motors, 1 Lithium-ion battery, and 1 internal combustion engine. Depending on the model, you can have a solar panel roof, do 0-60 mph in less than 6 seconds and reach a top speed beyond 125 mph.

How?

“…a small gasoline engine … turns the generator, which charges the lithium ion battery pack, powering the electric motor and turning the rear wheels.” The solar roof will help charge the car. 

Soon, you can buy the Ecochic, Ecosport, or Ecostandard model. Here is the brochure.  Prices start at $95,900. Estimated annual cost saving (on gas) is $1500.00. The car looks amazing.

In 2009, Fisker Automotive received a half-billion dollar loan from the U.S. Department of Energy to develop an affordable hybrid plug-in. The goal was a car that would sell for less than $40,000 that, Fisker says, will be available during 2012 or 2013.

The Karma is the first step. 

The Economic Lesson

So, again we have the question. Through loans and outright spending, what should the federal government fund? Should Fisker Automotive have received a federal loan?

This returns us to opportunity cost and how the money otherwise might have been spent or not spent. The most desirable alternative that was not selected is the opportunity cost of a decision. Choosing is refusing.

We also should think about what you believe the federal government should and should not do. Should the federal government only fund necessities that the private sector would not support such as a transportation network? Or, should government pay for goods and services that a society wants? 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment