Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: foreclosure

16736_3.24_000012425958XSmall

By Mira Korber, guest blogger.

Last week I asked some house painters how their business was doing and I was a bit surprised to hear their answer. They couldn’t buy brushes and rollers fast enough to keep up with the numbers of jobs on the schedule.

I hadn’t realized that  house painting could be profitable in a tough economy. If you are painting the right houses, that is. Specifically, foreclosures.

Let’s go back to September 2008 to begin. On September 7th, the US government took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored enterprises (GSE’s) that owned most of the bad debt associated with the subprime mortgage housing crisis. As home-owners defaulted on their loans, Fannie and Freddie could no longer afford to pay investors who had purchased the subprime mortgages, and tax payers took over their obligations through the government bailout.

Since the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it became responsible for the ever-growing number of foreclosed homes that accompany them. Because of this, Americans now own 200,000 foreclosures that will cost taxpayers $40 million in upkeep over the next year (Yahoo Finance).

In order to sell foreclosed homes, it makes sense that their appearances must remain coiffed, but that means taxpayers have a hefty lawn, flower-planting, and painting bill to swallow. A presentable house helps preserve already sinking home values, yet leaves everyone else in the neighborhood with burgeoning expenses.

Complicating matters, not all foreclosed homes are evenly maintained. A recent study cited in the WSJ  shows that houses in poor or minority are 42% more likely to have inconsistent maintenance than those in wealthier suburbs. (Speaking of which, a foreclosed property on my street — I live in a rural area — has not been touched in months.)

The Bottom Line: Even in a depressed housing market, some home-improvement businesses can capitalize on increased job opportunities because of the volume of foreclosures. However, as painters, landscapers, and handymen spruce up vacant homes, they aren’t cutting down on taxpayers’ grass maintenance bills.

Interesting sources on the subject can be found here:

Econlife, two years ago on foreclosures, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and lawns. How minority communities and maintenance mix, from the WSJ.  NBC San Diego, on banks that aren’t properly maintaining foreclosures. Foreclosure.com, if you’d like some visuals on just how many foreclosures there are. Yahoo Finance article with recent stats. NPR on lawn mowing and foreclosure last summer.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16136_7.17_000010007327XSmall

The story of a small home in Los Angeles is about much more than one house. Told by Marketplace.org and KCET TV, the story of the house on Lot 354 explains the entire housing bubble and bust.

Built in 1927, an 1800 square foot bungalow is bought by Shawna and James for $445,000 in 2002. Reflecting sky rocketing home prices in the neighborhood, the house is resold for $1.2 million to Jin and Chong in 2006. Having borrowed $900,000 to buy the house, and hoping that their $1 million home becomes a $2 million home which they can sell, the new owners default when the economy collapses. Foreclosed, the owners leave and the house is auctioned to its current owners, Eric and Alison, for $765,000.

You can see the buyers’ side of the story. Easy to borrow money, soaring home prices, excited people who see their net worth multiply.

Meanwhile, behind the scenes, we have Washington Mutual providing easy loans (and then imploding), real estate agents facilitating sale after sale, Fannie and Freddie packaging mortgages into mortgage-backed securities, investors buying the securities, servicing firms collecting all of this money and passing it from party to party.

But still, when we get right down to it, it really is all about one house. And then another, and another, and another.

You might want to listen to Planet Money’s story of the mortgage-backed security they purchased, Toxie.

The Economic Lesson

Mortgage-backed securities enabled a financial bubble to inflate because they funded house sales with more money than otherwise would have been available. More dollars chasing the same number of goods inflates prices. As with all bubbles, eventually prices cannot move any higher. At that moment, the bubble pops and prices descend.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment