Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: gender pay gap

gender-pay-gap1

By Lilli DeBode, guest blogger, senior at Kent Place School

Last Tuesday, April 9th was Equal Pay Day, the day symbolizing how far into 2013 women need to work in order to earn what men earned in 2012. You can hear all the numbers and statistics, see all of the graphs and tables, but nothing puts it into perspective quite like this. Women need to work roughly a third of a year longer in order to make what their male counterparts make. Let that sink in.

2013 marks the 50 year anniversary of the passing of the Equal Pay Act. A half a century ago, John F. Kennedy said that this act would help to end “the unconscionable practice of paying female employees less wages than male employees for the same job.” But 50 years later we still need to have an equal pay day. And although the situation is a lot better, we’re not that close to equality (four months is a pretty long time).

One solution that could make a huge difference is the Paycheck Fairness Act, which has been passed by the house twice. The act would combat a key component to gender wage gap: pay secrecy policies. In 2011, a poll showed that 50% of employees and 61% of employees in the private sector have worked in an environment where discussion of wages and salaries are either prohibited or discouraged by managers. By keeping employees from finding out the salaries of their coworkers, employers are able to carry on pay discrimination without any trouble. The Paycheck Fairness Act would ban retaliation against workers who discuss their wages, fundamentally banning pay secrecy.

President Obama spoke about fair pay in his State of the Union speech two months ago, showing that this longstanding problem has not been forgotten in Washington. This is a promising sign that more steps will be taken towards finally closing the gender wage gap in the near future.

Sources and Resources: To learn more about Equal Pay Day click here. Read this USA Today article to learn more about the gender pay gap.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Thinking of the gender pay gap, there might be a connection between New Hampshire politicians and Natalie Portman.

New Hampshire political life is dominated by women. New Hampshire’s 2 Senators, her 2 Congressional representatives, her governor, speaker of the State House and her State Supreme Court chief justice are all women.

It is possible that the 400 seats in New Hampshire’s General Court (state legislature) provided an easy route for entering politics. But also, one journalist hinted that the $100 salary made serving resemble female volunteerism. By contrast, the Pennsylvania state legislature pays $82,026 a year. Were New Hampshire women more willing than New Hampshire men to accept a lower salary?

And that takes me to Natalie Portman. In a Bloomberg radio segment on the movie stars who create the biggest return for their studios based on their salaries, I learned that Natalie Portman leads the Forbes list. For every dollar she earns, on average, her films return $42.70. The Bloomberg report suggested that as a woman, she was paid less. Therefore, a successful movie could be more lucrative for her employers.

Your opinion?

Our bottom line: In the US, on average, female salaries are close to 20% less than men’s. However, it also depends on where you live and your family status. Washington, D.C. has the smallest wage gap while Wyoming has the largest.

Monday Gender Issues Posts

Sources and Resources: Two good articles about New Hampshire politics were at Slate and the NY Times. Meanwhile, it was fun to go through the Forbes slide show on the movie stars who provided the best return. (As for the worst return, Forbes said it was Eddie Murphy.) And, econlife looked at the gender wage gap here and here.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

The Surprising Glass Ceiling in Sweden and France

Perhaps we should remember Hetty Green when trying to erase the gender pay gap.

Hetty Green, who died at age 82 in 1916, was a multimillionaire who owned Dewey, a terrier that bit people. Asked why she kept him, she repled, “He loves me and he doesn’t know how rich I am.”

Totaling at least $100 million, more than $2 billion today, her fortune was Wall Street money that she amassed through her own investing savvy. Born Hetty Robinson into a wealthy New England family, she was sent to New York by her dad with $1200 to buy clothes and find a husband. Instead, she saved most of the money and married years later when she was 31. When her father died in 1865, she inherited $1 million and a $5 million trust. But that was just the beginning.

Hetty Robinson Green was a a patient investor and a tough negotiator. After the Civil War, she bought undervalued government bonds and then railroad securities. When banks needed money, buying some of their loans, she began to amass a real estate portfolio that grew to hundreds of properties. As with the Georgia Central Railroad, when one faction offered to buy her securities, she understood timing and intimidation. Knowing the Georgia Central investors needed her, she held out until the shares that she purchased at $70 apiece climbed to $127.50 and earned her a $385,000 profit.

Yes, some called her the Witch of Wall Street because she wore a dowdy black dress (see picture below) and lived modestly in Brooklyn and then Hoboken. Not a spender, whether buying bread, visiting a doctor or purchasing stock, she negotiated. But when NYC faced a financial crisis during the Panic of 1907, it was Green who made the $1.1 million bond purchase that provided emergency funding. And when churches needed to borrow, her interest rate was low.

As an investor, she knew her goals, adhered to her principles and permitted no one to pay her unfairly. A model for aggressive negotiating, Hetty Green is a perfect example of a woman who would not accept the gender pay gap of 23 cents for white women and 31 cents for black women on each dollar earned described in yesterday’s NY Times article, “How To Attack the Pay Gap? Speak up.” Indeed, she could have taught all of us how to “Speak up.”

A Final Fact: Green summed up wise investing when she said, ”I buy when things are low and no one wants them. I keep them…until they go up and people are anxious to buy…I never speculate. Such stocks as belong to me were purchased simply as an investment, never on margin.”

The next 3 Monday posts will focus on gender issues.

Sources and Resources: The 2004 book, Hetty: The Genius and Madness of America’s First Female Tycoon was a fast and interesting read, the source of my quote on her investing philosophy (pp. 166-167). The book reminds us that, like Rockefeller, Carnegie, Morgan, Gould, and Armour, she too was born during the 1830s and built a massive fortune. Her Dewey quote was from a Barron’s column by John Steele Gordon.

Hetty Green With Dewey

Hetty Green Was A Successful 19th Century Investor Who Amassed A Fortune

This entry was edited with the addition of the pay gap.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Unless We Look More Closely at Women in the Global Labor Force, We See Only the Tip of the Iceberg.

Name a nation.

No matter which country you choose, you probably would see that women are underemployed. And still then, you would be looking only at the tip of the iceberg. Female labor force underutilization relates to a host of facts about a society that the consulting firm, Booz & Co. compiled in a recent report. Although I was not entirely convinced that all of their variables were quantifiable, I was quite comfortable with their basic premise. The world will be much better off when the one billion or so women that will enter the global economy during the next decade are appropriately empowered.

To assess female empowerment in 128 countries, Booz & Co. used input and output variables to create a Third Billion Index. Input scores involved components like female literacy, access to credit, laws about job opportunities; output numbers included male/female pay equity, the glass ceiling in business and in government, the types of jobs women occupy. Shown by their diagram below, based on the Index rank, Booz also grouped countries to display, for example, who was, “On the Path to Success,” or “At the Starting Gate.”

Crucially, the Booz report points out that the positive externalities of empowering women ripple far beyond the GDP. For example, women with income tend to invest more in their children. As a result, the impact on future generations is geometric.

Their conclusions? The top ranked countries are Australia, Norway, Sweden, Finland, New Zealand. The US is #30.

Sources and Resources: The Booz & Co. report, titled “Empowering the Third Billion: Women and the World of Work 2012,” is thought-provoking and, in some ways, surprising. I recommend that you take a look at it. For a much briefer summary, here is an Economist article and the source of my GDP graph below.

Empowering Women Adds to a Nation's GDP

Comparing How Countries Empower Women

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment