Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: George Washington

Alexander Hamilton must have been worried. In 1790, as Secretary of the Treasury, a troubled economy had become his responsibility. He had a huge federal debt to fund, a banking sector that was distressed, and an economy to stimulate.

Sound familiar?

Hamilton submitted a 3-part report to the Congress for their approval. Focusing on public credit, creating a national bank , and encouraging manufactures to diversify a farming economy, he had a plan for economic independence.

Public credit was crucial. Created by the Revolutionary War, the sovereign debt was primarily owed abroad. Hamilton had to reassure our European creditors that they would get all of the money that was due them. By funding the war debt, he would establish our good credit, a requisite, he believed for sound finance.

Hamilton understood that economic independence actually related to being dependable within a network of interdependence. The Congress and President Washington followed his lead, implemented his ideas, and the rest is history. The U.S. has never defaulted on its sovereign debt.

Sovereign debt is created when a nation sells bonds. Because banks typically purchase these bonds (governments, households and businesses buy them also), the health of the banking sector can be tied to the bonds that banks own. And so, whether we are looking back at the 18th century US, or Greece or Spain today, still manageable sovereign debt remains central to economic independence.

On this July 4, as we celebrate political and economic independence, let’s applaud Alexander Hamilton, the father of our economy.

These articles provide additional facts about how Alexander Hamilton established a national bank,  encouraged manufactures and created public credit. For euro zone sovereign debt concerns, this BBC interactive graphic clearly conveys each nation’s borrowing status.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Have you ever worried that you gave someone the wrong bill–maybe a ten rather than a dollar? With US currency, it is easy to make a mistake. After all, the US dollar bill, the five, the ten, the twenty, the fifty, the one hundred are mostly green, 6″ x 2 /2″, and they all have the Secretary of the Treasury’s signature.

Using Australian currency as an example, one expert suggests that varied size, different colors, user friendliness and durability are the basics of good currency design. With Australian currency, if you move up the currency ladder, from dollars to fives to tens, the notes get larger, maybe a centimeter each time.  In your pocket, you can feel the size of your bills and know what you have. Colorful, the 5 dollar note is sort of lavender, the 10, bluish, 20 is orangy (sometimes called a lobster), 50 is green and yellow (occasionally referred to as the piney because of its pineapple resemblance). Instead of some linen and cotton, the Australians use a plastic-like polymer that lasts 4 times longer.

Being so used to US currency, I wonder if we forget that it is dysfunctional. Or does it not matter because soon we won’t be using paper currency at all?

A wonderful podcast, 99% Invisible was my original currency design source. But for more, this NY TImes discussion from Richard Smith, perfectly describes why we need a newly designed currency and the site, “Room For Debate” looks at other coin and currency issues like the future of the penny and becoming cashless.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (1) Add a Comment

15931_10.7_000000111140XSmall

Who was wealthier George Washington or John F. Kennedy? You’ll find the answer in a fascinating Atlantic article that describes, from Washington through Obama, presidential affluence.

George Washington was very rich. Including his land, savings, inheritance, slaves, and other assets, Washington’s net worth, in today’s dollars, would have been a whopping $525 million! Yes, he did marry the wealthiest widow in Virginia. But perhaps more importantly, Washington’s papers indicate his interest in running his estate.

Moving through the article’s slide show and descriptions, trends emerge. Until the middle of the 19th century, presidents had considerable land wealth. Then, net worth plunges as attorneys and other salaried professionals became president. At the end of the century, with Grover Cleveland, we again start seeing some very wealthy men. During the 20th century, the Roosevelts, the Bushes, and JFK had inherited wealth while Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Harry Truman were not rich.

The Economic Lesson

We can divide our economic history into 5 major eras: 1) An agricultural era during which a transport network started to develop (1st half of 19th century). 2) An era dominated by capital goods formation and railroad expansion (second half of 19th century). 3) A consumer goods series of decades that was characterized by the onset of the automobile (first third of 20th century). 4) A depression era when government became more economically active (1930s). 5) An era when production of services surpasses manufacturing (1950s-now).

Each president’s wealth reflects the economic era in which he lived.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment