Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: government regulation

15771_3.16_000012166514XSmall

Words cannot describe the 2300 pages of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In a way, because it says so much, it tells us very little. Still though, after looking at the bill and several news summaries, I wanted to share some main ideas.

At first, “risk” and “protection” were the two words that came to mind. Risk: Lawmakers want to manage the impact of the risks taken by financial institutions. Protection: Lawmakers hope to protect consumers from making unwise financial decisions.  

Then, I discovered a second approach that made sense to me at WSJ.com where they described the basics of the bill through four categories: 

1) Government: Its powers will grow in order to preserve financial stability. Starting with the Federal Reserve, countless government regulatory agencies will be transformed.

2) Banks: Financial firms will experience new restrictions on trading different types of complex securities.

3) Consumers: A new bureau to protect consumers will be established. Its responsibilities will impact a plethora of financial activities. 

4) Investors: Different investing groups such as hedge funds, people who give investment advice, insurance companies, and those who create securities packages will have new constraints.

Essentially then we have four groups responding to a Congress that hopes to control financial risk and expand financial protection. With 2300 pages of text, mathematically, the ways in which the four groups can respond and then interact create countless permutations. 

The Economic Lesson

Passed in 1932 and 1933, the Glass-Steagall Act separated investment and commercial banking, changed the structure of the Federal Reserve, and created the FDIC. Although it was formally repealed in 1999, regulators permitted financial institutions to violate its spirit beforehand. When I read the act, I was surprised to see language that was as tough to follow as the current financial reform bill. However, as 34 pages of legislation, it had fewer variables and appeared to cover many of the necessary regulatory details.  

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Some people believe that government should control areas that we consider most valuable while others say precisely the opposite.
The “war” between government believers and market believers was evident in Saturday’s Wall Street Journal. Wherever kidneys are paid for through the market, more are available for those who will die without one. In the United States, 83,000 people are on the official transplant list. 16,500 people received a kidney and 5,000 died because they did not. Nobel winning economist Gary Becker estimated that $15,000 to living donors would minimize our shortage.
A government list or the market…Which solution is more ethical?

The Economic Lesson
The market: a system through which buyers create demand, sellers create supply, and an equilibrium price is established that optimizes benefits for buyers and sellers.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Should government care how much we weigh? Having just read Jacob Weisberg’s article on Bloomberg paternalism, I wonder whether our position on healthcare reform, on financial regulation, and other legislative topics relates to the same idea. It’s all about government. More or less? If you created a more government/less government continuum, for each issue, is your dot in the same place on the scale?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment