Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Governor Cuomo

How much should cities plan for the storm of the century?

After every storm of the century, we ask why we didn’t prepare sufficiently.

For Katrina it was better levee protection. And now, for Sandy, I just heard that the PATH–underground trains between NJ and NYC–had 4 foot flood gates (some news articles say 6 foot) from 1992 that just did not work. As a result, 10 million gallons of water flooded the system and created damage that will require at least $300 million to remedy.

On September 12, I posted the following:

Along its 520 mile long coastline, New York’s waters have eased upward at an inch a decade, a rate that some say is accelerating. If so, by 2050, another 2 feet might be added. Although not below sea level, New York is vulnerable. A direct hurricane hit could mean subways flooded for weeks, basements inundated, electricity out, undrinkable water, commuter transport lines incapacitated.

6 weeks later, on October 28, super storm Sandy hit. And yes, subways flooded for weeks, basements were inundated, electricity was out, water was undrinkable and commuter transport lines were incapacitated. Now, still cleaning up from her massive damage, NY and NJ are asking those September 12 questions. Should they prepare for the next Sandy? Should the PATH at a cost of $181 million have higher floodgates? Below is a picture of an inflatable bladder. At $400,000 or so apiece, these bladders could be mobilized when a storm approached.

Our Bottom Line: The timeless issue is opportunity cost. With cost defined as sacrifice, the cost of disaster preparation is whatever we cancel because we cannot afford to do both. To what extent do we divert money and resources that we need now to preparation for an event that might not occur?

How much should we spend for protection against the next super storm?

Sources and Resources: This blog from WNYC specifies commuting hardships created by Sandy and here is the article about and source of my picture of inflatable subway bladders. Responding, here is the Congressional debate about mitigation for future storms.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

How much should cities plan for the storm of the century?

Just some notes today about close-to-home Hurricane Sandy economics.

Trees:

  • Walking down my NJ street, I stopped to talk with 2 gentleman in a truck from Gainesville, Florida. They said they did tree work and had driven the 1000 miles to look for business. And there was lots. Every neighbor has countless downed trees that need removal. That actually started me thinking how the euro-zone was created to facilitate the movement of labor and goods among many nations. And here, with labor from Florida in NJ, I saw the same idea firsthand.

Gasoline:

  • It is unbelievable that the governor of New York could have offered free gas to EVERYONE in NYC and Long Island. Worried about shortages, to millions of people, Governor Cuomo announced that 10 gallons of free gas would be available at emergency mobile gas stations. The idea did not quite work out.  If you have a shortage of something and then offer it for free, what happens on the downward sloping demand curve? Much more quantity is demanded. Rather than create a public service, the Governor exacerbated the shortage and less was available for first responders to drive to storm emergencies.

Scrap:

  • A huge tree is still resting on my neighbor’s car roof in his driveway. The car might soon end up at the Claremont Terminal scrap yard. A destination for bags of soda cans, steel from the old Yankee Stadium and now debris from Hurricane Sandy, the scrap business sees a supply increase after storms like Sandy. Described by a scrap yard executive, “You’ll see a quiet period as material is aggregated and cleanup begins, but then a lot will start coming in.” As he also explained, cars arrive last because of insurance issues. (This econlife post has more about scrap yards.)

Sources and Resources: This NBC report has more about the Governor’s free gas plan and pictures of the response while this WSJ.com article made the scrap yard business interesting and was the source of my quote.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Decisions Have An Opportunity Cost That Require Tradeoffs

It appears that the New York State legislature will soon experience a clash between gun producers and gun control advocates. These quotes sum it all up:

A Remington employee: ”In my eyes, Remington goes away, Ilion goes away.”

A gun control advocate: ”Look, frankly, if we really want to keep jobs in New York, let’s invest more money in yogurt.”

First the story and then a look at why “guns and yogurt” is a classic opportunity cost dilemma…

Ilion, New York might have been called Remington. Home to 8,000 people, the town’s economy is based on the Remington Arms factory and its children attend Remington Elementary School. Based in Ilion for close to 200 years, this Remington Arms factory employs 1,000 people and, counteracting manufacturing cuts in the area, has added to its work force.

The people in Ilion are worried that Remington Arms will leave if New York State further tightens its restrictive gun laws. They have heard that New York’s Governor Cuomo will make less gun violence a top priority and that proposed legislation could limit firearm purchases to one person/one firearm per month, mandate background checks for ammunition buyers and require microstamping, essentially a ballistics ID for semiautomatic pistols. Responding, a Remington executive said it would “reconsider its commitment to the New York market…” because of the retooling expense (and perhaps because of the unwelcome environment).

Ilion is afraid that Remington will leave. By contrast, referring to Fage and Chobani production in NYS, the Executive Director of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence suggests that the state could attract more yogurt production if the gun makers leave.

This is a classic opportunity cost dilemma. Defined as the sacrificed alternative that a decision creates, the opportunity cost of supporting gun producers is advocating gun control. The citizens of Ilion are saying, “If you support gun ownership, you will increase employment and productivity in our town.” However, the group of citizens that advocates the stricter gun control laws believe they will help society. You can see the tradeoff. Choose one and you sacrifice the other; choosing is refusing.

Sources: I learned about the Remington Arms story in this NY Times article. Here, econlife looks at yogurt production in NYS. And finally, to see the similar tradeoffs for environmental concerns and economic efficiency, you could go here and here.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment