Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Hillary Clinton

Pantsuits Convey Power

Today, some thoughts about pantsuits and power.

One scholarly analysis of Hillary Clinton’s pantsuits concluded that they displayed her toughness.

In a Harper’s Bazaar interview, Nancy Pelosi is asked, “How many pantsuits do you have?” Her answer: “I don’t have any idea. Endless.”

According to Business Insider, because Angela Merkel wears the same Bettina Schoenbach pantsuit style everyday in a different color, she might have inspired the recent Greek riots. The reason? Her attire conveys rigidity. (After a state dinner, Ms. Merke gave Hillary Clinton a framed newpaper picture of the 2 of them from the waist down captioned, “Which one is Merkel, which one is Clinton?”)

Candy Crowley and Martha Raddatz both wore traditional black suit jackets when they moderated presidential and vice presidential debates.

Female Supreme Court justices frequently wear pantsuits.

One analysis of female news anchor attire points out, though, that the pantsuit mandate is fading. Seven years ago, Fox anchors started wearing dresses, more make-up and higher heeled shoes. One analyst suggested that as the status of female anchors ascended, they felt sufficiently powerful to dress individually. Still though, an Indiana University study revealed that male viewers forgot the news content (called a cognitive fog!) when delivered by “boldly dressed women.”

Our bottom line? Female participation rates in the US labor force (see below) have skyrocketed during the past 50 years. And yet still, to compete in the workplace, for women more than men, clothing can affect their success.

Sources and Resources: The articles discussing the connection between female empowerment and attire were fascinating. I read about Angela Merkel in Business Insider and WSJ.com,  Hillary Clinton, in this scholarly paper, Nancy Pelosi in Harper’s Bazaar, and got further insight from msmagazine. For the history of what female news anchors have worn, this Washington Post article was excellent.

Women's Participation Rates Have Soared

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Obama/Biden and Romney/Ryan Issues

Although tonight’s presidential debate is about foreign policy, perhaps the real focus is the economy.

More than 200 years ago, Alexander Hamilton created the connection between economic policy and foreign policy. By funding the Revolutionary War debt, he established public credit and US borrowing power. By supporting manufacturing, he fueled economic growth. With a plan for a National Bank, he initiated a financial infrastructure. Together, his ideas formed a development plan that ultimately built US power at home and abroad.

Or, as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, “Simply put, America’s economic strength and our global leadership are a package deal. A strong economy has been a pillar of American power in the world. It gives us the leverage we need to exert influence and advance our interests.”

So, let’s say that tonight, moderator Bob Schieffer asks the candidates this question suggested by a Bloomberg journalist:

“The Duchy of Grand Fenwick has just invaded Freedonia, a stalwart U.S. ally. Do you seek United Nations Security Council permission before intervening, do you build a coalition of the willing to strike back, or do you call for an immediate cease- fire?”

To demonstrate funding flexibility and worldwide leadership, a realistic response involves debt and deficits, trade partners and trade policy, energy and GDP growth.

It takes the candidates to talking about:

  • a US debt that is 73% of GDP (the highest share since 1950).
  • China, Japan and other countries who purchase our debt by buying treasuries.
  • trading partners that include eurozone countries and emerging economies.
  • domestic and foreign oil, natural gas, coal and energy independence.
  • propelling US economic growth.

 

As former World Bank president Robert Zoellick said in Foreign Policy, we need to realize that the economics of foreign policy is about much more than sanctions and financing wars. “Today, the power of deficits, debt, and economic trend lines to shape security is staring the United States in the face.”

A final fact: Even war involves economics. When President Roosevelt mobilized the US to fight WW II, he had to gather an economic team to calculate how many tanks, planes, ships we could produce. The economic group used national income accounting, recently developed by Simon Kuznets during the 1930s, to determine how much land, labor and capital could be shifted from elsewhere like making pots and pans to wartime production.

So, yes, when President Obama and Governor Romney refer to Afghanistan or the Arab Spring or the UN, yes, they will probably discuss the military and political freedom and worldwide alliances. But economic issues are a central consideration.

Sources and Resources: Here, Republican Robert Zoellick and here Democrat, Hillary Clinton each discuss, with detail and insight, the above quotations and the crucial connection between the economy and foreign policy. And, the hypothetical question for the candidates came from this Bloomberg article.

Election Economics Topics:

 

Please note that this post was slightly edited in the final fact and the paragraph that follows it.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment