Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: housing bubble

housing prices...16205_4.27_000010774987XSmall

Our recent housing bubble has been called a unique phenomenon by economist Robert Shiller. With its national impact, a connection to houses rather than land, and a demand side surge fueled by “investor-induced speculation,” the rise and subsequent fall in housing prices (see graphs below) has been different from other real estate bubbles.

Here, though, is my description of the 1920s Florida boom and bust in an excerpt from Econ 101 1/2. Doesn’t it sound rather familiar?

“Before 1920, Miami Beach, Coral Gables and Tampa–indeed most of the Florida we know today–did not even exist. Widespread news of the glorious climate, the newfound mobility created by the auto, optimism because of Coolidge prosperity, and a swarm of developers transformed one huge expanse of swampland into a vacation wonderland…or what was supposed to become one.

In 1925 two thousand Miami real estate agents were reported to be selling acreage. Blueprints abounded. Entire communities were planned and sold long before the first bulldozers appeared. Across the state people were cutting down trees, moving tons of sand, fashioning lagoons, paving streets, and building houses and hotels. Without even counting vacationers, Miami’s population jumped from 30,000 in 1920 to 75,000 five years later.

{But then…}

The Florida boom collapsed in 1926. At first people began to default on payments for land on which they had left a binder. It was said that one gentleman who had sold some property for $12 an acre experienced regret because the land was resold repeatedly, at first for $17, then $30, and finally $60 an acre. The gentleman had cause for further regret. Because no one in the sequence of transactions had paid what was due, once Florid’s economic decline began, the property moved backward from hand to hand. The story ends with him repossessing his land.

Compounding the economic contraction in Florida were the other calamities that followed. Two hurricanes struck. A September 18, 1926 storm targeted Miami. It left hundreds dead and roofs, autos, yachts, and other assorted debris strewn haphazardly in its wake. The next step was for the banks to fail. With everyone needing more money and few having it, the number of Florida’s bank collapses steadily climbed. From thirty-one in 1928 to fifty-seven in 1929, the number was destined to rise even further. The final blow was struck when the Mediterranean fruit fly destroyed the 1929 citrus crop. And by then, because the entire nation was starting to experience an economic decline, there was no one to pick up the pieces in Florida.”

Unrealistic optimism, demand driven price increases, speculative purchases, a cascade of sales, catastrophic banking problems. For a real estate bubble, can we ever say, “This time it’s different?”

Sources and Resources: My thoughts about whether our recent housing bubble has been so unique started with economist Robert Shiller’s column in today’s Sunday Business section of the NY Times. It returned me to Econ 101 1/2, my book from what is now HarperCollins. (Out of print, Econ 101 1/2 will be published in a Kindle version during September, 2013.) The wonderful housing price maps that follow were from the NY Fed. Here, you can see a US map for each year since 2005.

Described by the NY Fed, these maps show “changes in home prices each month compared with prices one year earlier…”

Change in US Housing Prices 2008

Change in Housing Prices 2013

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Scrabble Z

Just like technology stocks during the late 1990s or housing in 2006, the Scrabble letter Z might reflect a market bubble.

The “price” of a Z is 10 points. However, one (Scrabble) researcher suggests it is really worth 6. Here is the story.

During the 1930s, when Scrabble was created, the value of a letter was derived from how often it appeared on the front page of the NY Times and perhaps several other sources like the Saturday Evening Post magazine. A letter that rarely surfaced in news articles like the Z would be more valuable because it was in fewer words.

Now though, the “Z” is in many more words (like za). Similarly, because we see them more frequently, c, j, p, f, h, k, m, and x  have too high a value. By contrast, G, L, V and U are undervalued.

Maybe, as with tech stocks and housing, we have a “Z” bubble?

A final thought: Curious about the 1930s NY Times issues on which Scrabble scoring is based, for a very unscientific survey, I looked at one page, of course concluded nothing, but loved this headline from Thursday, May 13, 1937:

“Housewives Entitled to Fixed Salaries Like Any Worker, Mrs. Roosevelt Holds”

Sources and Resources: Well worth your time, the 1930s article about Mrs. Roosevelt is wonderful in so many ways. For more about Scrabble’s history, I recommend this Time article and, for a new scoring system, this one from the BBC.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16426_4.27_000010774987XSmall

Let’s say that you purchased the house in which you now live during 1997 for the average national price, $171,900. With housing prices steadily rising, by 2006, a neighbor’s house would have sold for as much as $317,000.

In the NY Times, Nobel laureate Robert Schiller, explains the impact of rising home prices. Calling it a “contagion of optimism,” he says skyrocketing home prices fueled the stock market, the housing market, consumer spending and consumer expectations. Expecting our wealth to increase, we spent more.

But, trees do not grow to the sky.

After housing prices hit their high during the beginning of 2008, they plunged. The house that was worth $317,000 now would get $268,000 if it could be sold at all. This reversal of prices meant a reversal of expectations.

Dr. Schiller believes that economists were unable to understand the housing bubble because prevailing economic theory inadequately explained the impact of our expectations.

The Economic Lesson

Economists study our expectations because they relate to current decisions, future outcomes and government policy.

University of Chicago economist, Robert Lucas (1937- ) won the 1995 Nobel Prize in economics for his theory of rational expectations. Rational expectations theorists tell us that:

For example, if people think housing prices will rise by 10%, those selling a house will price it 10% higher. The result? Prices are up by 10%. How should government respond? You can look here.

An Economic Question: Thinking about wages, how might expectations about inflation create inflation?

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16406_6.2_000013669809XSmall

We have a double dip in U.S. housing prices. But, is it happening everywhere? A Goldman Sachs research report from mid-May provided an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) summary.

  1. The most troubled: Struggling euro zone countries remain the most distressed. Housing prices in Ireland, Spain, Greece, the Netherlands and Italy have continued to slide.
  2. Moderately declining: The U.S. falls into this category as well as Denmark, Korea, and many euro-area countries.
  3. Rebounding: Canada, Norway, and Australia have experienced double digit increases. Less robust but still rebounding, housing prices in France, Germany, and New Zealand have been going up.
  4. Steadily rising: There actually were countries that sidestepped the housing bubble cataclysm. Switzerland and Belgium have not seen any meaningful drop in prices and now, they continue to rise.

The Economic Lesson

How might a supply and demand graph illustrate the U.S. moderate decline in the housing market? The key is our equilibrium price, the point where the demand and supply curves meet.

What is making this point move downward? Is it a shift in the demand curve because government policy is no longer fueling demand? Or, is it the supply curve sliding downward because of an ever increasing number of houses that people offer to sell each time prices appear to rise?

An Economic Question: Using this Washington Post graphic of housing prices in 12 cities, create your own story of how the housing bubble popped in different places.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

housing prices...16205_4.27_000010774987XSmall

In an interesting Politico opinion column, journalist Michael Kinsley wonders why everyone seems to assume that climbing home prices are good. He points out that most people are happy when the prices of essentials like gas go down. So why the opposite for homes? 

After all, the young couple first buying a home wants a low price. The family that is trading up might not want their new home to be priced higher. Only, he says, the retiring couple that intends to downsize or leave the market entirely clearly benefits from higher prices.

Yes, he admits he is oversimplifying. Still, he asks why the media uses pejorative terms for declining prices and affirming adjectives and verbs for rising prices.

Your opinion?

The Economic Lesson

Certain economists might say that the market is the solution and that prices have to fall until the demand side of the market has enough to buy. Other economists, worried about foreclosures, diminished perceptions of wealth, and higher home prices fueling economic recovery believe that government should subsidize the housing market and/or keep mortgage rates low.

You can go to an excellent S&P/Case-Shiller graph here to see where home prices have gone between 1988 and 2010.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (1) Add a Comment