Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Internet

texting is 20 years old

Sometimes, you never know…

At first, it was just a “Merry Christmas” message sent from a computer terminal to a cell phone. The year was 1992, the firm was Vodafone, and the goal was just a better way for secretaries to page their managers. The managers, though, could not reply. And anyhow, they figured the service was limited because it was too much of a hassle to type a message.

Think of what had to happen between then and now.

  • Develop a 2-way system so the recipient could reply.
  • Enable texting among different networks.
  • Figure out what to charge and how to charge.
  • Redesign cell phones.
  • Develop “text-speak.”

And the rest is history. In the US, in 1995, the average user sent 0.4 texts a month; by 2000 it was 35 a month; now Pew Internet says the “median teen text user” sends 60 messages a day. And texting has become a $150 billion business.

Below, CNN interviews Neil Papworth, who was 22 when he sent the “Merry Christmas” text 20 years ago.

Our bottom line? While sometimes you never know where innovation will go, Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) would remind us that it leads to creative destruction.

A final fact: It is interesting to ponder the words that accompany innovation. For the telegraph (1844), Samuel Morse tapped: “What hath God wrought?” With his telephone, Alexander Graham Bell said (1876), “Mr. Watson, come here–I want to see you.” And, Neil Papworth, the gentleman who sent the first text message said that most engineers are happy just to say, “Testing, testing testing.”

Sources and Resources: During the The Economist’s Babbage weekly podcast, I first heard about the texting birthday and then read a bit more about it here, here and here. And here, you can read more of the Pew Internet study in “Teens and Smartphones.”

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16296_4.8_000011060280XSmall

At work, we “should not be watching that excellent new video of a schnoodle howling along to its own piano playing.” Yes?

According to New Yorker journalist James Surowiecki, the answer actually is, “No.” Citing recent academic studies, he says that people “addicted” to the Internet are more productive when permitted to indulge during business hours.

This takes us to “willpower” studies. Presented with a platter of radishes and a platter of chocolate chip cookies, the group asked to avoid the cookies did more poorly on subsequent tasks that required self-discipline. Somewhat similarly, when a group was divided between people who could watch a funny video and those who were not allowed to see it but heard others enjoying it, the people who saw the video then performed a task more accurately then those who did not.

The Economic Lesson

Defined as more output per labor hour, productivity results from more inputs (land, labor and/or capital), better inputs, and/or a more effective combination of inputs.

Surowiecki asks whether we might be more productive at work if company policy permitted us to surf the internet during “internet breaks.”

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment