Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: iPad

a queue..a line..16798_8.12_000009783048XSmall

Walking along 56th Street in NYC, maybe a half block before 5th Avenue, I always see people on line. (New Yorkers say on line. Almost everyone else says in line.) They are waiting to enter Abercrombie & Fitch.

Usually we associate an economic cost with a line. Time wasted. Irritation. Inadequate customer service. For Abercrombie, though, it might be a benefit.

Researchers from the University of Chicago Business School concluded that total queue length conveys the value of a product. The longer the line, the better it must be. In addition, they found that the number of people behind you is crucial. If we are ahead of many others, feeling a sense of accomplishment, we attribute more value to our goal. In one example, the researchers actually found that when there are many people behind us, we also tend to spend more.

Amazing. A long line snaking for blocks at an Apple store. And most of us think about the value of the product rather than the long wait.

Our Bottom Line: Queues are all about cost and benefit. If the vendor enables us to perceive a benefit, then a line like the one at Abercrombie can become a competitive strategy.

If you just want to enjoy hearing about lines, this 99% invisible podcast is a pleasure. For a more serious read, here is the U. of Chicago paper.

And a final thought… wasn’t it the lines that brought down communism? But that is a different story.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16900_books

By Mira Korber, guest blogger.

The Amazon rainforest may be shrinking, but Amazon.com certainly isn’t.

The superpower “e-tailer” has all but taken over, and it’s selling just about anything, but Amazon.com threatens one industry just as much as climate change threatens its arboreal counterpart.

The publishing industry is in danger. By cutting out publishers — essentially the middlemen — in book sales, Amazon can pay authors a higher percentage of profits, and charge consumers lower prices to acquire books.

Barnes and Noble is faced with potential extinction. Even with Borders gone, it’s still struggling to survive. This NY Times article discusses the complex conundrum B&N must confront. It also cites that in the past 8 years, about one in five independent bookstores have disappeared from the market. 

The question is largely whether Barnes and Noble will be able to sell enough of its eReaders, “The Nook,” to keep the company (and by extension its dependent publishers) alive. Therefore, in some kind of plot twist, the very publishers threatened by the Amazon Kindle’s explosive growth are clinging to a different eReader’s future success just to stay in business.

Interestingly, this past December, small-bookstores called for an Amazon.com shopping boycott based on the company’s practices to divert their business.

Now, where does Apple fit in? With the ever-developing iBooks store, the iPad is another competitor at odds with the Kindle and the Nook. Committing to the new iBooks store prohibits publishers from selling rights to any other companies, thereby barring  content from Amazon and the Nook. But then again, it is unlikely that large publishers will want to transfer exclusive selling rights to Apple.

We’re all reading within a changing market for books. And soon, it seems that we all may be flicking touch screens instead of flipping pages. 

The Economic Lesson

Again, the rise of Amazon.com attests to economist Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of creative destruction. As new industries emerge, old ones die off as part of an ever-changing marketplace.

Side note: A monopoly exists when one firm dominates in a market and is a “price maker;” with no competition, the monopoly is free to set any price for its goods and services…

…A related economic question: Do you see a monopolistic power developing a.k.a. Amazon.com? And if you buy from Amazon, do you see yourself as a participant in this emergence?

 

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16140_1.20_000007530747XSmall

An ibike? A solar-powered iPhone? Or maybe an iKey? 

During 2010, Apple received 563 patents. In addition to the iBike, a solar-powered iPhone, and an iKey, Apple’s patents included a wand remote and a touchscreen iMac. When asked about Apple’s products, one person who follows their patent history said it was not about superior technical ability. Instead, it was all about vision. 

That takes us to Apple’s founder and CEO, Steve Jobs, who just announced he was taking a medical leave of absence. Asked about how much market research he did to develop the iPad, he answered, “None. It isn’t the consumers’ job to know what they want.”

It also takes me to Steve Jobs’ commencement speech at Stanford, 2005. Wonderfully inspiring, it provides insight about this gentleman who describes what he “stumbled into by following his curiosity…”

The Economic Lesson

We call Apple an oligopoly because it competes against few firms, it has some control over price, it enjoys the benefits of mass production, and market entry and exit are relatively difficult. Also, as demonstrated by Apple, product differentiation is the key to successful competition.

As one Bloomberg commentator said, with Apple, “…after buying something you never thought you needed, you decide you can’t live without it.”


 

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15603_4.24_000010886362XSmall

Reading Ken Auletta’s recent New Yorker article on the iPad and the Kindle, I first thought of “the razor or the blade.” While Amazon loses money on books in order to sell Kindles, razors were precisely the opposite. Get a cheap razor, buy blades for a lifetime, and Gillette has an unending stream of revenue. Doing the opposite, Amazon has dominated e-book sales. 

Amazon also broke other rules:

Price taker or price maker? Six publishers control 60% of the business. These classic oligopoly stats mean that they should have control over price and yet Amazon was able to charge $9.99.

A New Pie? According to Auletta, for a $26 hardcover book, the publisher gets 50% of each sale, pays the author 15% of its revenue, covers publishing expenses, and also accepts returned unsold copies. Now, with e-books selling for $9.99, the revenue pie has changed. 

Which market? Instead of competing against other publishers, maybe now all media based activities have a toe in the same market with everyone vying for a piece of the consumer’s time.

Perhaps the one rule that has not been broken relates to innovation. As entrepreneurs implement new ideas, existing firms will be forced to change or disappear.

The Economic Life

Joseph Schumpeter best explained the march of new ideas as creative destruction.  

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment