Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: licensing

lobster_000020857751XSmall

The year is 2008. Icelandic banks crash. Canadian lobster processors lose their financing.

The result? Demand from Canadian processors for Maine’s lobster harvest decreases.

Meanwhile, on the supply side, the lobster population is soaring. Conservation rules that established maximum and minimum weights meant fewer lobsters were harvested. In addition, lobster predators like cod and striped bass were being overfished and South American warm-water lobster tails and a bumper Canadian lobster crop entered the market.

You can see that this is a classic demand and supply story. On a graph, decreasing demand shifts the downward sloping demand curve to the left while more supply means the upward sloping supply curve moves to the right. The result? Price plummets.

Specifically, during 2012, the price of lobster in Maine at the dock more than halved from $5 a pound to close to $2.00. And, like the 1930s when Iowa farmers burned their corn crop because the price was too low (and the countryside smelled like popcorn, really, from this source), daily fishing trips diminished. The cost of fuel and bait would exceed the price of the catch.

Still one more financial term: Arbitrage. Seeing how cheap the Maine lobsters were, NYC lobster roll purveyors are driving them down, charging $9 a pound for the lobster and $14 for the lobster roll according to NY Magazine.

For an article about the Maine lobster glut and its impact on NY lobster rolls, this NY Magazine article is wonderful. More serious, these Herald Business and Washington Post articles also describe the plight of Maine’s lobster fishermen.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

red tape...bureaucracy..16181_12.29_000011761845XSmall-3

What does a hair salon “shampoo specialist” have in common with a private detective? In certain states, each needs a license to do business.

But what might licensing involve? For a Texas shampooer, it includes 150 hours of classes while a locksmith in Oklahoma has to pay a fee, take a test, and undergo a background check.

A type of occupational regulation, economists have studied licensing because of its impact on the jobs market. Licensed occupations can have greater prestige, protect consumers, pay higher wages, charge higher prices, preserve the status quo, raise money for the state, and constrain employment growth.

So, should we support it?

More specifically, for each of the following, who should need a license? Acupuncturists? Tattoo artists? Tree-trimmers? Glass installers? Florists? Massage therapists? If yes, requirements?

To make a decision, you might want to read this.

The Economic Lesson

We could say occupational licensing is a market vs. the government issue. Opponents of more licensing say the market would weed out incompetence. Proponents say the consumer needs protection. It could also take us to unemployment. Studies have shown more licensing, less employment growth. Yet another possibility is innovation because licensing tends to preserve the status quo. 

During the past 50 years, licensed occupations have multiplied from 5% of U.S. workers to 23%.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment