Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: market system

Obama/Biden and Romney/Ryan Issues

Comparing Obama/Biden and Romney/Ryan economics, people name John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich von Hayek. Having looked at Hayek several weeks ago, let’s turn to Keynes now.

During 1934, with unemployment high and production low, British economist John Maynard Keynes was reported to have crumpled up a pile of towels rather than just one after washing his hands in a U.S. restaurant. His goal he said (if this really happened and no one is sure) was to create more jobs.

More than businesses though, Keynes (1883-1946) believed that a contracting economy needed the job creation that government could provide through deficit financing. Government spending would then multiply as it passed from hand to hand. Just pay a worker, he spends his income, the recipient then spends it, businesses have to expand and an inflated total of spending enters the GDP.

Like the New Deal, it was okay to have people plant pine trees and build airports. It was ideal to establish a social security program that provided incomes people would spend. The Keynesians believe that when government diminishes unemployment, consumers spend more and businesses, feeling some optimism, expand. Then tax revenue increases, government repays the money it borrowed and the deficit shrinks.

By contrast, Friedrich von Hayek said prices are the key. During his 1920s/30s dialogue with John Maynard Keynes at the London School of Economics, Hayek reminded us that during a recession the price of labor falls, the price of capital declines, interest rates sink. Lower prices ultimately transform the price incentives that generated the recession. They become enticing messages that say, “Hire, Expand, Borrow.” According to Hayek, rather than government and politicians, only the individual business people that hear that message know the appropriate answers. (Please see EconLife entry on Paul Ryan’s economic muse.)

Supporting a Keynesian approach, President Obama proposed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the $787 billion bailout program that ballooned to $840 billion in 2011. As a Congressman from Wisconsin, VP candidate Paul Ryan voted no. Currently, the Romney/Ryan team says it is time to inspire the private sector with less government.

Sources and Resources: There are lots of excellent articles on John Maynard Keynes. For a readable summary, this John Cassidy New Yorker article is very good, I got my “towel story” here from WSJ.com, and econtalk has a good discussion of the Wapshott book on Keynes and Hayek. For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,  the NY Times has the spending details, this government site gives an overview, and EconLife has some analysis.

Election Economics Topics:

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

arrow...16197_8.8_000011872893XSmall

Adam Smith might look at recent increases in manufacturing and say, “The market works.” Here are some stories.

One furniture manufacturer decided it could make consumers happier by moving back from China. Yes, it would mean paying a sander $10 an hour instead of the Asian 63 cents an hour rate and charging $700 for a crib instead of $400. But also, they could emphasize the quality, safety, color variety and “green” certification that new parents and grandparents (who help to pay) look for in a crib.

Other manufacturers are returning to the US because wages for certain less skilled manufacturing jobs are falling. After it negotiated lower wages for new hires,GE moved an electric water heater plant from Mexico to Louisville, Kentucky. Elsewhere, workers are accepting $10 an hour instead of the $15 to $18 that prevailed 5 or 6 years ago.

Also, US manufacturers have been encouraged by the 13% productivity boost during the past 5 years. An example? At a Leechburg, Pennsylvania machine shop with computer controlled machines that produce metal parts, orders are increasing, employment is up to 37 from 22 and so too are wages by about 20%.

So where are we? Let’s go back to Adam Smith.

On the demand side, self-interest propels expansion. Here, self-interested manufacturers are figuring out how to lure consumers away from China’s bargains with more safety, higher quality, and better design.

As for the supply side, Adam Smith said that during a contraction falling wages would eventually stimulate expansion. Some outsourced business is returning to the US as wages fall or rise more slowly than other sectors. With a more attractive wage structure and the productivity that automation generates, supply is increasing and manufacturing jobs are up 4.3% since 2010.

For more details, you might enjoy these 2 WSJ articles, here and here, that were my sources while this recent post on US and Belgian twin steel factories tells a similar story.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16736_3.24_000012425958XSmall

Have you ever washed a rented car? Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers tells us that, “In the history of the world,” no one has.

For rental cars and Cuban houses, lack of ownership is the common denominator. When Fidel Castro took control of Cuba, he declared that everyone would get a home but no one could buy or sell one. As a result, described by NPR, everywhere, walls are patched with scrap metal, grillwork is rusty, and facades are crumbling.

Now, with Raul Castro, Fidel’s brother, announcing that Cuban citizens could sell their homes, renovation, painting, maintenance and for sale signs are popping up everywhere.

The power of the market system?

Here is an NPR report on Cuban small business start-ups.

The Economic Lesson

Cuba imports 80% of its food supply while the price of nickel, its main export, and tourism, its main “import,” have both declined. Raul Castro said, “We have to erase forever the notion that Cuba is the only nation in the world where it is not necessary to work,” The Economist suggests he might be leading his nation toward a Chinese type of mixed economy.

A mixed economy combines government intervention with a market system. You might want to look at the Index of Economic Freedom to see the extent to which 179 economies are mixed.

An Economic Question: Moving from a command economy to the market, how might incentives change?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16596_6.30_000005521931XSmall

The illness? High unemployment and sluggish growth. The patient? The U.S. economy. And sometimes, according to Nobel Laureate Gary Becker, a stimulus pill just won’t work.

In a WSJ opinion piece, Dr. Becker first explains that government misdiagnosed the illness. Rather than “market failure,” the problem is “government failure.” Before the recession began, the Fed’s rates were too low, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were quasi-government institutions that facilitated subprime mortgage lending, and regulators were ineffectual.

The misdiagnosis led to the wrong cure. Adding to the deficit and debt, stimulus spending did not work out as predicted and Dodd-Frank became another layer of regulation when existing laws were not adequately enforced. According to Dr. Becker, because the “imperfections in government behavior were greater than those in the market” only the market is the cure.

With Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman their leading spokesman, a second group of economists responds that the diagnosis was correct and the dose of the stimulus medicine needs to be increased.

The Economic Lesson

Seemingly chaotic, a market actually has an invisible hand guiding all participants. Consumers demand quality goods and services that are priced low. Proft-seeking businesses produce the goods and services that consumers, businesses, and government want. When markets function well, reasonable prices and appropriate quantities are the result. In addition, competition tends to prevent individual abuse and control individual power.

An Economic Question: Your choice–Becker’s position or Krugman’s?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16574_12.5_000003349474XSmall

Faster people tend to live in wealthier nations.

According to psychologist Robert Levine, cultures with faster walkers probably have more people, a cooler climate, a “vital economy” and they value individualism. Measuring “tempo” in 31 different countries, in A Geography of Time, he explains how time and the fabric of our culture interact.

To assess your own “time urgency,” Dr. Levine suggests you consider these variables:

  1. Do you care what time it is?
  2. Do you speak quickly? Tolerate interruptions? Look for the point of a statement immediately?
  3. Are you a speedy eater? Walker? Impatient driver?
  4. Do you value punctuality?
  5. Do you depend on lists?
  6. Do wait times annoy you?

Here, in a past post, we look at more of Dr. Levine’s work.

The Economic Lesson

In his NY Times Economic View column, economist Tyler Cowen tells that U.S. productivity numbers are slipping. If a worker has less output per hour, then the impact can be felt far beyond the workplace. Living standards, GDP and wages will be affected.

And that returns us to time. A society with a faster tempo is likely to be more productive.

An Economic Question: Specifically, how might “time urgency” and productivity relate? Examples?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (1) Add a Comment