Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: New Yorker magazine

Industries afflicted with Baumol's Disease have slower productivity growth.

Could Cheesecake Factory help us fix our healthcare system?

Touring the kitchen of a Cheesecake Factory restaurant, you would see arrival, refrigeration and storage areas, and cutting, mixing, chopping and combining zones. Preparing the 308 dinner choices that their menu offers, chefs use recipes that specify ingredients and amounts but exclude seasoning and timing details. Essentially divided between prepping and cooking, the kitchen is reminiscent of a well-organized factory.

In a wonderful New Yorker articleAtul Gawande tells us that the people who run the different parts of our healthcare system might learn a lot in a Cheesecake kitchen. Cheesecake and the US healthcare system both offer a vast array of goods and services that are individually produced. Cheesecake has a standardized backend and efficient friendly service. Its prices are relatively low and its consumers appear happy. Meanwhile, the US healthcare system is coping with escalating costs, mediocre service and inconsistent quality.

In his article, Dr. Gawande takes his readers from his dining experience and subsequent research at Cheesecake to one family’s calamitous hospital visit and his own mother’s well-coordinated knee replacement. Successfully, he demonstrates that coordination of many individuals and services is tough, doable and crucial for a restaurant chain that serves 80 million people and also for a medical system.

Dr. Gawande’s suggestions took me to economist Randall Bartlett and his Teaching Company course, “Thinking Like an Economist.”  Discussing Pareto optimality, Dr. Bartlett said that a policy improves social welfare if it makes even just one person better off without making anyone worse off. I wondered whether the suggestions for improving our healthcare system can ever achieve sociologist Vilfredo Pareto’s criteria.

You can read more about Vilfredo Pareto here. I do recommend listening to Dr. Bartlett’s lectures and reading the New Yorker article.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15723_5.7_000010364681XSmall

A letter in “The Mail” section of a recent New Yorker tells us about a funny error on the cover of the May 17, 2010 issue. Mainly portraying emissions from vehicles, factories, and cows, the cover focuses on our environmental problems. According to the letter writer, though, the illustrator, “..has the ‘ends’ mixed up.” The cow “releases only trace amounts of gas through its rectum [as drawn]…; the hundreds of quarts of methane it contributes to the atmosphere each day are belched.”

Thinking about the cover, I recalled pending Congressional legislation that concerns emissions. Through the “Electric Vehicle Deployment Act of 2010,” the Congress proposes that we minimize auto emissions and oil consumption. The 77 page (pending) law includes a $10 million prize for creating a 500 mile battery and a process for establishing between 5 and 15 “deployment communities”.

I wonder whether government R & D support should be so specific. Should federal dollars go to institutions rather than a precisely described result? Aren’t the best ideas generated when we encourage a more open ended approach?

The Economic Lesson

Through an opportunity cost chart, we could determine the benefits of targeting one technology and the benefits of an attractive alternative approach. Knowing that choosing is refusing, hopefully our legislators use cost/benefit analysis.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (1) Add a Comment