Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: price ceilings

Venezuela Map

The Venezuelan economy in 3 pictures:

Price Ceilings

Price Ceilings

Observed during October, 2010, the sign shows that there is a price ceiling for Diana Oil. At 4,73 bolivars, the ceiling is 32% less than 7 bolivars, its “capitalist price.” As always, price ceilings lead to long lines and shortages.

However, for retirees and others with more free time, the cost of the inconvenience has been minimal.

Subsidized Gas Prices

Subsidized Gas Prices

At 4 cents (!!!) a gallon for regular, Venezuelan gas is heavily subsidized.

In addition to such inexpensive fuel, poor Venezuelans enjoy free neighborhood health clinics free housing and government pensions. As a result, the poverty rate is down and Venezuela is faring better on the UN’s Index of Human Development.

Ranked #19 by transparency.or, Venezuela is one of the most corrupt countries in the world.

A score of 19 from Transparency International indicates that Venezuela is among the more corrupt countries in the world.

The subsidies, the price ceilings, the wealth redistribution, and nationalized oil fields have distorted the normal incentives created by demand and supply. The result is a pervasive corruption that constrains economic growth.

Perhaps one Bloomberg headline sums it all up: “Hugo Chavez, R.I.P.: He Empowered the Poor and Gutted Venezuela.”

A final question: Can short term benefits from income redistribution be worth the tradeoff of long term economic growth?

Sources and Resources: Bloomberg, here and here, has excellent articles on the Chavez legacy. My gas price information and picture were from CNN Canada, the price sign from N. Gregory Mankiw’s blog and here is the UN’s Human Development Index. I do recommend looking at Transparency International’s corruption index.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

A Price Ceiling Has Unintended Consequences

Asked if it makes sense to mandate lower rents for some apartments in large cities, many of us say yes. Lower rents facilitate diversity and they enable middle income municipal workers to live close to home. Affordability is good. Yes?

The residents of Cambridge, Massachusetts displayed their support for rent control when they voted to continue it in 1995. However, because the rent control mandate lost in a statewide referendum, Cambridge residents were defeated.

Maybe, though, they really won.

Looking closely at the impact of capping apartment rents on all properties built before 1969 in Cambridge, 2 researchers uncovered a steep downside. Reducing rents 25% to 40% lower than nearby apartments made the value of all housing– controlled and non-controlled–decline. In addition, for rent controlled properties, the peeling paint and loose railings were examples of generally poor upkeep. And, as all econ books remind us, rent ceilings create shortages because, at a lower price, more quantity is demanded than the amount supplied.

After 1995, when the controls were lifted, assessed values rose. For previously controlled properties, they went up approximately 20%. For non-controlled buildings, the increase was even more. Totally, the amount values rose from 1994 to 2004 because rent control ended was estimated as close to $1.8 billion.

Our bottom line: The connection might seem distant but let’s return to a previous post on price gouging. Both rent control and anti-price gouging laws sound like attractive public policies with considerable voter appeal. However, both have negative externalities– a harmful impact experienced by an uninvolved third party–that represent the hidden cost we all pay.

A final fact: There are approximately 1 million rent controlled units in NYC.

Sources and resources: Thanks to Timothy Taylor for the Conversable Economist post that explains the impact of rent control in Cambridge, MA and for his link to the original study. If you want to read more about rent control, here is the story of a challenge in NYC that involved the Supreme Court. For anti-price gouging laws, here is what NJ Governor Christie is enforcing and here is a criticism.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment