Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: state deficits

16152_6.16_000006078784XSmall

A state would not call a “B” a good grade. The grade is a credit rating that relates to a loan. Triple-A usually means not to worry. On the other hand, a “B” says you might not get paid back.

As you know, recently, credit ratings have been problematic because borrowers with high grades have defaulted on their loans. So, sort of like changing the rubric for a test, Moody’s is (slightly?) changing the way it judges states. As a result, New York and California are among the states that may get higher grades while Connecticut and Hawaii are two of those whose “grades” will decline.

To assess the economic health of different states firsthand, you might want to look at these interactive maps on tax revenue, unemployment, foreclosures, and stimulus oversight from Pew’s Center on the States. You also could go to Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s website to look up a state’s grades.

The Economic Lesson

If not all borrowers are attractive, then why loan them money? The answer is price. The interest rate is the price of money. When a loan appears more speculative, then its price–its interest rate–goes up.  How does it go up? In money markets, we can observe supply (lenders) and demand (borrowers) at work. For a more risky loan, the supply curve shifts to te left and crosses demand at a higher “price”–interest rate. So, a lender might accept the risk because he or she is getting a higher price.

 


Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16148_6.16_000006078784XSmall

We know it’s not New York or California. The bottom of the list also includes New Jersey, Arizona, Florida, Nevada and others. These are the states that, having mismanaged spending and taxing, are now facing tough fiscal decisions. Their finances don’t add up and in a tough economy and the chance that growth will provide the solution is small.

Who then did the right thing?

Utah

Given an “A” by the Pew Governance Performance Project for “good data and strong processes,” Utah implemented performance based budgeting. This just means that they actually looked at the numbers, saw what worked and didn’t, and then eliminated non-performing programs. For example, the number of employees recruited by a $300,000 program to help businesses was minimal so it was canceled.

Other states lauded by Pew for their approach were Virginia, Maryland, and Indiana.

The Economic Lesson

Three words explain performance based budgeting: margin, benefit, cost. Looking at the margin means looking at something extra. For budgeting, it just refers to the extra item being funded. That takes us to cost and benefit. Here we just compare. If the cost for the extra exceeds the benefit, then the good or service would be cut.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16146_12.6_000013720460XSmall

We could say that what you solve depends on what you see. When told about ballooning state deficits, people first see big numbers. Their response? Let’s cut spending. According to polls, though, when asked yes or no about cutting specific programs, most of us say no, we can’t cut schools, or libraries, or ……just about anything.

By contrast, our cities see potential bankruptcy and states see default (because, as sovereign entities, they cannot declare bankruptcy). A paper from The Brookings Institute suggests that our leaders look at California and the Intermountain West for insight about the “colossal challenges” facing most states.

Presenting specific examples from California, Colorado and Nevada with more of a focus on Arizona, Brookings tells us that we have had a catastrophic convergence of politics, deficits, and demographics. The paper is unique because it displays how very different conditions from state to state could have created the same dismal results.

1) It all began with “…a growth cycle that produces rising income tax revenues that in turn lead to tax cuts.

2) Meanwhile we had, “…healthy revenues that convince the public to mandate spending increases…”

3) Add to that “a growing population that needs to be served by program expansion” and you get a recipe for disaster when the boom turns to bust.

Only one state is cited in the paper for political leadership that made wise fiscal decisions during good times and bad. More about that state and solutions, tomorrow.

The Economic Lesson

Economists call the recession’s impact on state budgets “cyclical” because its origin is the business cycle. A cyclical impact includes less tax revenue because of unemployment and added spending that social services require. Cyclical deficits disappear when the economy expands.

The second type of spending is “structural.” Ongoing, structural obligations reflect a fundamental imbalance between revenue and spending whether the economy is expanding or contracting. They refer to spending that is a continuing promise such as government employees’ pensions or educational mandates.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16132_3.24_000011088049XSmall

Do higher taxes make you want to move? Hearing that taxes were going up in Illinois, the governor of Wisconsin said, “Escape to Wisconsin.”

According to census figures, people do seem to be moving to no income tax states. One journalist explains that Texas has become an “engine of growth” because of its “diversified economy, business-friendly regulations, and low taxes.” For Texas, more people will also mean 4 more seats in the House of Representatives.

However, with a $15 billion deficit, Illinois’s governor indicated a tax hike was imperative. Meanwhile, with a $10.5 deficit, New Jersey’s governor emphasizes spending cuts. Both are worried about businesses and residents leaving their state.

The Economic Lesson

The unencumbered movement of people, goods and services over vast areas fuels economic growth. People and resources are then able to optimize their goals by moving. Furthermore, when factories have a larger market, they can enjoy economies of scale. They also have more consumers to target, a larger labor market, and additional places to obtain natural resources and capital.

Asking what makes people move, Harvard economist Ed Glaeser suggests taxes are not necessarily the reason. Instead, his research indicates that fewer land use and construction regulations result in lower cost housing. Cheaper real estate attracts migration.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16050_12.6_000013720460XSmall

Which state postponed a pension fund payment of $3.1 billion because of big budget problems and had a 2.4% decrease in its real GDP? (Still though, this state has the second highest median income.)

The answer? New Jersey.

New Jersey, though, is not alone. Jon Stewart told us that Arizona had to sell its statehouse (which included the governor’s office). A potential California default was the prototype for an Economist simulation. Illinois borrowed money to fund its pension obligations and then had to borrow money to repay the original loan.

According to a Pew study on state financial problems, “Most Americans (58%) say the states should fix their own budget problems by raising taxes or cutting services.” But, “…large majorities oppose…” cutting major spending categories which include education, pubic safety (police and fire), and health care.

Perhaps the reason for the contradiction is opportunity cost. The individual opportunity cost of cuts is far different from the statewide cost.

The Economic Lesson

Looking at a BEA map of state economic growth during 2009 provides a snapshot of state health. Oklahoma is at the top (+6.6%) and Nevada, the bottom (-6.4%). For the GDP of individual states, agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, and mining fueled growth. On the minus side, less durable goods production (goods lasting longer than 3 years) and construction diminished economic activity.

Composed of gross investment (primarily business purchases and residential housing), consumer spending, government spending, and exports minus imports, the GDP is a yardstick of the value of goods and services production.

 

 

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment