Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Stephen Colbert

Affecting the cost of animal feed and lowering the amount of milk from cows, the drought is pushing up milk prices.

Discussing the impact of this summer’s drought on pizza, Stephen Colbert said, “It is one thing for global warming to make the sea levels rise but nobody told me it could make my cheese levels recede.”

Colbert was reacting to an economist at the US Department of Agriculture’s Research Service saying, “…you’ll see less cheese on pizzas and in salad bars.” The reason? In 90 degree temperatures cows produce less milk, dairy farmers need costly sprinklers and fans, and the drought has also driven up the price of animal feed. As a result, milk is more expensive and more expensive milk means more expensive cheese.

Just imagine your cheese supply curve. When the cost of production increases, the upward sloping supply curve shifts to the left and crosses the downward sloping demand curve at a higher equilibrium price and a lower quantity.

Colbert also suggested that farmers switch to drought resistant crops like sun-dried tomatoes and raisins.

Because of the drought that is affecting close to 63% of the continental US (please see map below), in addition to dairy industry costs, 52% of the corn crop was in poor or very poor condition, more cattle was slaughtered because of skyrocketing feed costs, the price of ethanol has risen, and the northbound barge trip between New Orleans and Memphis takes 3-5 extra days. (With lower water levels, barges need to shed weight and also take turns moving through shallow areas.)

If the drought continues, the Department of Agriculture predicts a 3-4% hike in food prices for 2013. Since last year, food prices have gone up 2.5% to 3.5%. And finally, very interestingly, economist Ed Yardeni explains in his blog why QE3, the drought and the GDP are related. As with food prices, it all relates to inflation.

Sources and Resources:

My stats, the stories and the map below are from either this WSJ article, weather.com, or this USA Today report. A video excerpt from the Colbert Report was the source of all that Stephen Colbert said. Looking at my sources and their links, you will see the multiple ripple of impacts, ranging from pizza to crop insurance to a miniature golf business, that this drought has created.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15763_5.7_000010364681XSmall

Reserves were low, demand was high and prices skyrocketed. No, not oil.

Butter.

Butter demand surged in Norway several months ago when a low carb high fat diet swept the nation. At the same time, the supply of butter plunged because wet weather diminished the quality of livestock feed. Worse feed meant less milk.

You see where this takes us. More demand, less supply, and not only will price rise, but for Norway, it also meant a devastating butter shortage.

Here, Stephen Colbert tells the whole story of Norway’s butter crisis and a Russian butter smuggler.

The Economic Lesson

Usually, Norway represents a happy economic story. Endowed with immense oil wealth, they used the proceeds wisely by establishing a Government Pension Fund to invest in the future. Recognizing the possibility that the value of their currency would soar because of oil demand, they discouraged people from buying relatively cheap imports by protecting domestic industries. One result was a dairy cooperative monopoly. So, when the butter crisis hit, there was no way to get extra butter until tariffs were lowered. Until then, supply contracted and demand soared.

As you can see, Norway’s butter crisis is a economic tale of oil wealth, monopoly, tariffs, supply and demand.

Here, Slate tells the whole economic story.

An Economic Question: How would a demand/supply graph represent the Norwegian butter price spike and quantity shortfall?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15976_4.10_000005989308XSmall

For some smiles and econ also, the following links are fun.

It all began with Harvard’s N. Gregory Mankiw’s NY Times op-ed column on higher tax rates. Explaining, he said that $1000 wisely invested, with no taxes, became $10,000 in 30 years. By contrast, letting the Bush tax cuts expire slices that $1000 to a $523 check which other taxes further deplete. The result? In 30 years, the amount grows to $1700. Knowing that he would have considerably less to save for his children could result, he said, in writing fewer columns.

Stephen Colbert responded to Mankiw here. And, after that, Mankiw’s students replied to Colbert.

Smiling at the exchange, we can also consider the debate about tax rates and see how Dr. Mankiw’s students used demand and supply to present the impact of Colbert on their teacher.

The Economic Lesson

In Teaching Company Lecture 3, from “History of the U.S. Economy in the 20th Century,” Professor Timothy Taylor describes a roller coaster of tax rates. Starting from a top 77% rate after World World I, rates then descended more than 40%. Taylor tells us that while tax rates fluctuated considerably, tax revenue remained remarkably constant then and at other times during the 20th century.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment