Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Texas

foreign investment, world, 16467_11.12_000007395743XSmall

Oddly, some US farm subsidies go to Brazil.

Imagine a safety net when you think of a subsidy. If prices are too low, then growers get money from the federal government. During the 1930s Great Depression, the goal of subsidies was to sustain a farmer’s purchasing power when he had a bad year.

Fast forward to 2013. Because the US is the world’s leading cotton exporter, our farmers depend on the world price. if that price is too low, they get a subsidy.

This is where Brazil enters the picture. Because US subsidies lower production costs, they depress world cotton prices for Brazilian farmers. Complaining to the WTO, a World Trade Organization composed of 151 countries that include the US and Brazil, Brazil said US cotton subsidies violated WTO rules. A WTO panel agreed.

However, Brazil still had a problem. Because WTO decisions are not enforceable and the US Congress was not about to eliminate subsidies voluntarily, the panel’s decision was virtually meaningless. Then though, Brazil threatened retaliatory measures that would include ignoring US pharmaceutical patents and music copyrights. It worked. Faced with WTO condemnation, angry Brazilians, US firms fearing retaliation, and subsidized US farmers, the US government devised a unique solution. As of 2010, through the Brazilian Cotton Institute, we would pay Brazilian farmers $147.3 million every year–$12.275 million monthly–until an acceptable farm bill is passed.

The farm bill is still being debated.

Our bottom line? Subsidies, like tariffs and quotas, are barriers that diminish the efficiencies of free international trade. As barriers, they obstruct David Ricardo’s comparative advantage and the ability of nations to produce goods and services for which they have the lower opportunity cost..

Sources and Resources: NPR’s Planet Money explains the US/Brazil cotton dispute in one wonderful 30 minute podcast. But then, for more of the specifics, I recommend this 2011 report from the Congressional Research Service. To complete the picture, this Slate column provides all you want to know about the Farm Bill that the US Congress is considering. (Econlife looked at the bill’s impact on the dairy industry here.)

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Job Gains in Texas and Losses in Caifornia and Florida

Sort of, we can “celebrate” a birthday. 5 years ago, the Great Recession began.

And that takes us to Texas where they can celebrate. Among the large metropolitan areas in the US, Austin (#1), Houston (#2), San Antonio (#4) and Dallas (#7) are in the top 10 for employment numbers that have surpassed their 2007 totals.

Why Texas? The Economist suggests it is because of mortgage regulations that precluded a severe housing crisis, population increases, and of course, energy.

Based on BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) data, this Economist chart illustrates the employment divide between Texas and California.

Employment in Texas Exceeds 2007 Totals

Sources and Resources: My facts are from The Economist and business cycle data from the NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research).

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16655_8.18_000006973938XSmall

Why is the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline in Wyoming close to $3.36 and New York, $4.00?

Location and regulation.

Wyoming produces oil, it refines it, and, its taxes are among the lowest in the country. Also because of good location and less regulation,  Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Alaska have cheap gas.

By contrast, as a non-producer and high taxer, New York has relatively expensive gas. Sharing the #1 spot, California has high gas taxes while Indiana, Illinois, West Virginia and Michigan are close behind.

Here are some handy maps to see taxes, prices, and a list of producing states.

The Economic Lesson

Typically, when the world price of a commodity is higher than the domestic price, a country prefers to be an exporter. Using Brent Crude as a benchmark, the world price is higher than domestically produced West Texas Intermediate (WTI). However, logistics make exporting WTI at a competitive price relatively tough.

Today’s prices are approximately $125 for Brent and $105 for WTI. This explanation explains oil prices further and names other types including Nigerian Bonny Light and Algerian Saharan Blend.

An Economic Question: How might the price at the pump affect retail sales?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16746_3.9_000008354384XSmall

How to picture the US/European economic partnership?

You could think of Skippy Peanut Butter. Owned by Unilever, a multinational based in the UK and the Netherlands, Skippy’s peanuts are grown primarily in Georgia and Texas, shelled and sorted here, and then made into peanut butter. As a result, a European firm is providing business to US farms, it is building US factories, and it is creating US jobs.

For another side of our economic partnership, you might imagine Texas. During 2009, totaling close to $25 billion, exports from Texas, including petroleum, electronics, crops, and transportation equipment, were primarily sold in the Netherlands, the UK, Belgium, France and Germany. Meanwhile, European foreign affiliates were responsible for 212,000 jobs and invested close to $60 billion in Texas.

Or, we could just think of Bic, Adidas, Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream, Trader Joe’s, and Sunglass Hut…all European firms.

In this 169 page report from Johns Hopkins, a detailed description of the transatlantic trade tells us that the US and Europe dominate each other’s trade activities. Ranging from California at the top to Hawaii at the bottom, every US state exports to Europe and receives European goods and services.

The Economic Lesson

You can see where this is going. Looking at foreign affiliates, foreign direct investment, jobs, exports, intrafirm trade, shared financial services and R & D, the US and Europe are closely tied. Looking at both directions, what European firms have here and what we have there, we see a massive economic connection. As a result, turmoil in the euro zone means more to us than a continent’s well being. It touches our own economy directly.

An Economic Question: Referring to transatlantic trade, how might euro zone economic woes specifically affect the US GDP?

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16132_3.24_000011088049XSmall

Do higher taxes make you want to move? Hearing that taxes were going up in Illinois, the governor of Wisconsin said, “Escape to Wisconsin.”

According to census figures, people do seem to be moving to no income tax states. One journalist explains that Texas has become an “engine of growth” because of its “diversified economy, business-friendly regulations, and low taxes.” For Texas, more people will also mean 4 more seats in the House of Representatives.

However, with a $15 billion deficit, Illinois’s governor indicated a tax hike was imperative. Meanwhile, with a $10.5 deficit, New Jersey’s governor emphasizes spending cuts. Both are worried about businesses and residents leaving their state.

The Economic Lesson

The unencumbered movement of people, goods and services over vast areas fuels economic growth. People and resources are then able to optimize their goals by moving. Furthermore, when factories have a larger market, they can enjoy economies of scale. They also have more consumers to target, a larger labor market, and additional places to obtain natural resources and capital.

Asking what makes people move, Harvard economist Ed Glaeser suggests taxes are not necessarily the reason. Instead, his research indicates that fewer land use and construction regulations result in lower cost housing. Cheaper real estate attracts migration.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment