Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: Thomas Jefferson

Alexander Hamilton must have been worried. In 1790, as Secretary of the Treasury, a troubled economy had become his responsibility. He had a huge federal debt to fund, a banking sector that was distressed, and an economy to stimulate.

Sound familiar?

Hamilton submitted a 3-part report to the Congress for their approval. Focusing on public credit, creating a national bank , and encouraging manufactures to diversify a farming economy, he had a plan for economic independence.

Public credit was crucial. Created by the Revolutionary War, the sovereign debt was primarily owed abroad. Hamilton had to reassure our European creditors that they would get all of the money that was due them. By funding the war debt, he would establish our good credit, a requisite, he believed for sound finance.

Hamilton understood that economic independence actually related to being dependable within a network of interdependence. The Congress and President Washington followed his lead, implemented his ideas, and the rest is history. The U.S. has never defaulted on its sovereign debt.

Sovereign debt is created when a nation sells bonds. Because banks typically purchase these bonds (governments, households and businesses buy them also), the health of the banking sector can be tied to the bonds that banks own. And so, whether we are looking back at the 18th century US, or Greece or Spain today, still manageable sovereign debt remains central to economic independence.

On this July 4, as we celebrate political and economic independence, let’s applaud Alexander Hamilton, the father of our economy.

These articles provide additional facts about how Alexander Hamilton established a national bank,  encouraged manufactures and created public credit. For euro zone sovereign debt concerns, this BBC interactive graphic clearly conveys each nation’s borrowing status.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Dark Moody Full Moon One Day Waning Part Covered by Dark Cloud

Astronomy might help us understand US history according to biographer Walter Isaacson. We just need to think about binary systems in which 2 separately orbiting stars “are linked because of their gravitational interaction.”

The tension between Hamilton and Jefferson was his first example. One for a national bank, the other against, one for strong central government, the other said no. In separate orbits, they influenced each other and the country.

For Jobs and Gates, Isaacson says the connection was similar. As the mind and passion behind Apple, Steve Jobs was intuitive, a romantic, a perfectionist who focused on design and usability. Meanwhile, Bill Gates led Microsoft methodically, a natural at computer coding, disciplined, practical. Again, we have 2 very different men with different views of the world who affected each other and us.

And now, Pew Research has reported their newest conclusions about our political polarity and an economic binary system again seems to have evolved.

Especially for 5 economic issues, Pew tells us that the “values gap” between Republicans and Democrats has increased. Numerically, the values gap is the percent reflecting how much Republicans and Democrats disagree. For example, asked if the government should take care of people who cannot take care of themselves, because 75% of all Democrats and 40% of all Republicans said “yes,” the values gap was  35.

This table, based on their study when it began and now, displays the average size of the values gap for multiple questions in each category.

1987 2012
Social safety net 23 41
Environment 5 39
Labor Unions 20 37
Equal opportunity 17 33
Gov’t. scope and perf. 6 33

 

With Republicans and Democrats forming a binary system, how might future legislation display the impact of their “gravitational interaction?”

The entire Pew Report is here and Walter Isaacson looks at Gates and Jobs in Steve Jobs, Chapter 16.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

16508_6.16_000006078784XSmall

This story is about a country that had massive debt. A recent war had been expensive and the economy had big problems. Still though, powerful political leaders opposed the solution that the Secretary of the Treasury proposed.

Yes, the country is the United States but the year is 1790. Because of the Revolutionary War, the U.S. owed French and Dutch bankers $11,710,378. From citizens at home it had borrowed $42,414,085. Using calculations from historian John Steele Gordon, the U.S. Revolutionary War debt was close to $19 trillion in today’s dollars–$5 trillion more than we currently owe. Behind on interest payments, a worthless currency (“not worth a continental”), a huge national debt, rampant inflation, we faced debilitating obligations. What to do?

To manage the debt, Alexander Hamilton first had to solve 2 problems.

Problem 1: Who legally owns U.S. bonds?

Revolutionary war bonds were primarily held by wealthy merchants and unscrupulous speculators who had purchased the securities when they were virtually worthless from loyal patriots. Enraged, James Madison said that the present bondholders should get a partial repayment and the original holders should get the balance. Opposed also, John Adams was said not to understand the connection between funding a national debt and economic prosperity.

By contrast, Hamilton realized that for the economy to grow from a sound foundation, contractual obligations had to be preserved. When a bond was sold, the new owner, whether a widow or a shady speculator, had to be recognized in the eyes of the law. 

The final vote in the House, supporting the Hamiltonian plan, was 36-13. Hamilton’s father-in-law, who owned government securities, said that the opposition’s comments “made his hair stand ‘on end as if the Indians had fired at him.’”

Problem 2: Should the federal government assume the states’ war debts?

Some states like Virginia had repaid their debts while others, including Massachusetts, had not. On this issue, Jefferson was Hamilton’s main adversary. Hamilton said the U.S. was responsible for all existing debts; Jefferson said Virginia should not have to pay “twice.”

To secure a compromise, Hamilton invited Jefferson to dinner. Accompanied by Madison, Jefferson agreed to support the assumption plan if the new capital would move from New York to the “muddy and fever-ridden banks of the Potomac.” (p. 31)

So, you can see that our Congress has always been divided on debt issues. And, when it really mattered, they voted, they compromised and they made a wise decision.

Here, in American Heritarge Magazine, you can read more about Hamilton’s proposals, the opposition, and the resolution through which European and domestic bondholders were repaid. In Hamilton’s Blessing, historian John Steele Gordon provides a more detailed history of the U.S. debt through 1995.

The Economic Lesson

With good credit, for relatively low interest rates, a nation can borrow money from creditors at home and abroad. According to scholars Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, the tipping point at which debt becomes excessive and unmanageable for most nations appears to be 90% of GDP. In 2010, the U.S. debt was close to 90% of its GDP.

An Economic Question: Referring to funding and how it is used, explain how sovereign debt relates to economic growth.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

idea..light bulb...research...innovation..16213_3.19_000010421717XSmall

Is it likely that, with each new discovery, innovation gets tougher?

It might have been easier to identify an asteroid a century ago because the undiscovered ones were very big. It might have been simpler to find a new human organ; the last one, the parathyroid gland, was discovered in 1880. Similarly, developing plants with larger fruit gets to a point where incremental progress is smaller and smaller.  

So, where does this take us?

1. To teams. With discoveries becoming more complex, the “renaissance man” like Thomas Edison or Albert Einstein, no longer can know it all. Instead, scientists need to pool their expertise.

2. To a knowledge plateau. According to economist Tyler Cowen, because the “low hanging” fruit has been picked, it is ever more difficult to make the scientific breakthroughs that spearhead growth.

3. To a very busy patents office. With scientific teams submitting ever more complex research, it takes the patent office more expertise, more people, and more money to issue the patents that new firms frequently require.

4. To a President with a challenge. Saying in his State of the Union address that innovation is the key to future economic growth, President Obama now needs to determine the governmental incentives that will accelerate innovation. Economist Mike Mandel has several policy suggestions

The Economic Lesson

With Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 saying, “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limit Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries,” the US Constitution established the right to protect innovation.

Interestingly, although Hamilton and Jefferson did not entirely agree, both were involved with the first Patent Act in 1790.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

15901_9.22_000011470702XSmall

Thomas Jefferson and President Obama had similar concerns about financial speculators. In 1790, Thomas Jefferson opposed funding the domestic part of the Revolutionary War debt if the financial speculators who bought bonds at a depressed price would benefit. Instead Jefferson hoped that the original buyers of the bonds would get some money even if they no longer owned them. Fast forward to this week’s town hall meeting. Referring to the depressed housing market, President Obama said, “And we think it’s very important that speculators…that they’re not getting help.”

The similarity between Jefferson and Obama? Both wanted to be sure that when government acted, speculators would not profit.

Alexander Hamilton’s response to Jefferson also relates to today. Hamilton believed that whoever legally purchased the Revolutionary War bonds, legally owned them, and could legally profit from them. He was not concerned with speculators.

The Economic Lesson

Many call the U.S economy a market system but a mixed economy would be more accurate. Together, the market system and the government guide economic activity. We could say that we have a continuum with government at one end and the market at the other. Since 1790, we have moved to the left and right along that continuum, continually debating the role of government.

 

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment