Subscribe to our RSS feed
EconLife.com connects economics to everyday life, current events and history.

Tag Archives: unemployment rate

Job Gains in Texas and Losses in Caifornia and Florida

Yes, at  7.6%, the unemployment rate is almost the same as last month. So too, at 11.7 million is the number of unemployed people. But some analysts think something is changing radically. They are concerned about participation rates.

When we look at unemployment, we see labor force statistics. The participation rate, though, is about people who are not in the labor force.

Think of it this way…

The US labor force is composed of people 16 and over who are gainfully employed or unemployed and looking for a job. No job? Not looking? 16 or over? Then you are not participating in the labor force. Mathematically, the participation rate compares everyone who is or could be in the labor force to those who actually are in it.

It is entirely logical that prime-age workers participate more than the young and the old. Men have a higher participation rate than women. Hispanic males participate more than white or black males.

US Labor Force Participation Rate, 2003-2013.

From the Bureau of Labor Statistics, people 16 and older.

From the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Percent of people 16 and older who are in the labor force.

In the graph above, representing just a decade, you can see that declining participation rates parallel the Great Recession. Covering more than 50 years, the broader trend below includes the 1960s-1990s rise in women’s participation rates.

From the San Francisco Fed.

From the San Francisco Fed.

Some look at the 2003-2011 graph and say the participation rate line plunged because of the Great Recession. Laid off and unemployed for a long time because of a GDP contraction, people left the work force. In addition, aging baby boomers retired early after fruitless job searches. Others, though, say we are undergoing fundamental  structural change. Unequipped to do new types of jobs, huge number of workers are leaving the work force. The jobs are there and the workers are there. But they do not match.

With economists that lean to the left supporting the cyclical side and those on the right saying structural, the debate about what ails our economy continues. Perhaps we can all agree, though, that choosing the right economic “medicine” means we have to diagnose our economic illnesses accurately.

Sources and Resources: Two Federal Reserve Reports, one from the Chicago Fed and the other from San Francisco provide excellent analyses of participation rates.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

jobs...16865_9.1_000009319445XSmall

University of Chicago economist Casey Mulligan believes that the US unemployment rate has remained high because of many separate public policy changes. Big and small, each one influenced workers, businesses and consumers by creating new incentives.

For workers, Dr, Mulligan described a bigger safety net:

  • People could collect unemployment insurance (UI) for 99 weeks instead of 26.
  • Food stamp programs became more inclusive with less stringent qualifications.
  • The food stamp benefit grew by 40% in 2 separate stages.
  • A $25 “bonus” was added to the usual unemployment benefit.
  • The duration of work history was decreased as a qualification for UI.
  • Mortgage help increased for longer unemployment.
  • The unemployed could receive 65% of their health insurance expense.

 

He also explained why, for businesses, the incentive to fire workers increased:

  • Concerned employers knew that fired workers would get relatively high benefits.
  • Obamacare taxes and tax hikes are making employees more expensive.
  • It became increasingly attractive to replace workers with less expensive capital.
  • Employees had to be fired (rather than quitting) to qualify for unemployment benefits.

 

In addition, certain consumers had less to spend.

  • Increased taxation involves taking more money from one group than it gives to the other group.

 

As a result, several million lower income workers had more when unemployed than with a job while the majority had the equivalent of 85% to 90% of their previous income. Yes, of course, depending on the individual, the new incentives have a varied impact. Still though, Dr. Mulligan asks all of us first to recognize that our lawmakers have implemented changes that he believes have increased the unemployment rate substantially.

Then we have to decide whether we support the tradeoff: More support for the unemployed or more efficiencies that lead to fewer unemployed?

7.9% during January, the civilian unemployment rate touched 10% during October, 2009.

7.9% during January, the civilian unemployment rate touched 10% during October, 2009.

Sources and Resources: An hour long, every minute of the econtalk podcast in which Casey Mulligan described his research and new book to Russ Roberts was captivating. It perfectly conveyed the tradeoff that we all need to know, whatever our preferences. Then, for recession data, here is the BLS website.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

Job Gains in Texas and Losses in Caifornia and Florida

Everyone was surprised that the US unemployment rate for September dipped to 7.8%. Interpreting the number as evidence of an accelerated recovery, some people were delighted. Others advised caution, saying the statistical source of the unemployment rate is not always dependable.

To complicate matters further, the monthly employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics also includes job creation numbers that, at 114,000 new jobs for September, were below the number that would keep pace with population growth.

So, one number great and the other not. Why?

The numbers differ because the unemployment rate and job creation numbers are based on 2 entirely separate sources. Here are some of the differences:

1) The unemployment rate is based on the household survey (technically known as CPS, Current Population Survey), a canvas of just 60,000 households. The sample, based on home visits by Census Bureau workers, comes from the entire civilian non-institutional population aged 16 and over and even includes unpaid household workers.

2) The job creation numbers come from the establishments survey (technically known as Current Employment Statistics survey), collected from approximately 486,000 business and government establishments. Their sample, collected from submitted data, looks at nonfarm wage and salary jobs.

You can look here for more about how the 2 surveys differ.

Sources and Resources: The BLS link is the best for firsthand survey information and Fox has a good interview. If you watch the video, please note they got the labels backwards on their graph but the content is good. Also, NPR Planet Money has a good summary of the two surveys.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

presidential election...campaign button_000016905913XSmall

Here are some jobs facts that might be helpful when you listen to the candidates.

During 1933, the unemployment rate was a cataclysmic 24.9%. Having entered office that year, FDR was re-elected in 1936 with unemployment still soaring but better at 16.9%. The next president to be reelected with pretty dismal unemployment numbers was Ronald Reagan. The year was 1984 and the average unemployment rate was 7.2%, down from 7.5% 4 years earlier.

Both FDR and Reagan faced major economic challenges when they entered office. For FDR, the Great Depression was unprecedented. With Reagan, stagflation–inflation and unemployment- was tough to solve because the solution to one problem made the other worse. For both, things were getting better when they sought a second term.

That takes us to a question we will be asking in “election economics.” How much has the economy improved since President Obama entered office?

Using the following table, we can look at several yardsticks and arrive at different conclusions.

January 2009 October 2009 July 2012
Household survey employed 142.1 million 138.3 million 142.2 million
Nonfarm payrolls employed 134.4 million 131.0 million 133.2 million
Unemployment rate 7.6% 10.2% 8.3%
Change from previous month: Household survey -1.2 million -589,000 -195,000*
Change from previous month: Nonfarm payrolls survey -655,000 -190,000 +141,000*

*Not considered statistically significant

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Unemployment:

  • The unemployment rate increased from 7.6% when Mr.Obama entered office to a peak of 10.2% several months later and then decreased to its current rate, 8.3%. (Do you remember when unemployment was 4.4% during March 2007?)

 

Number of Jobs:

  • The number of jobs that have been added to the economy is a debatable figure.  If you compare January 2009 and now, job numbers have remained almost the same. Instead, starting when unemployment was at its worst, using figures from the households survey (more about the survey here) on which the unemployment rate is based, there are 4 million more jobs now. On the other hand, the nonfarm payrolls survey indicates that the increase in those who are employed has been 2 million jobs.
  • Finally, we could just say all that matters is the number of jobs that are added monthly. Then, we just look at the nonfarm payrolls totals and see that there were 141,000 jobs added.* (Please do go to this econlife post  to see that actually, a seasonal adjustment calculation created that result.) However, the nonfarms payroll numbers exclude the self-employed, household workers and other types of workers.

 

So where does it leave us on whether the jobs picture is looking better? Perhaps we just have to see how people feel.

Released by the Conference Board several days ago, consumer confidence dipped because, “Consumers were more apprehensive about business and employment prospects…Those expecting more jobs in the months ahead decreased to 15.4 percent from 17.6 percent, while those anticipating fewer jobs rose to 23.4 percent.” All though was not negative. You can see a summary of the entire report here.

With graphs that were especially fascinating, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has a wonderfully thorough report on labor and the Great Recession and they have an interesting discussion about labor and the Great Depression here. For my statistics, I also used their monthly reports on unemployment.

*Originally, this post noted 163,000 as jobs created for July. However, the August jobs report revised it downward to 141,000.

Election Economics Topics:

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment

carouselhorse

By Mira Korber, guest blogger.

Pretend for a moment that you are mounted on a jumping horse approaching an obstacle full speed.  The next thing you know, you go hurtling through the air like some limp animal. What happened? Your ever-so-noble-steed has pulled a “dirty stop” at the last possible moment before takeoff.

Sounds like what some (non-horse) people are worrying about…regarding American jobs and the unemployment rate. So, what are the odds of an economic “dirty stop?”

In March, the US added 120,000 jobs, and the unemployment rate fell to 8.2%.  That’s showing “improvement” but hardly represents a panacea for ever-burgeoning recovery woes. Some economists expected 210,000 jobs added to the economy, and the unemployment rate to remain at 8.3% (accounting for people actively looking for work).

However, as the rate has fallen and a smaller than expected number of jobs have materialized, it seems that fewer people are looking for work. Another issue is that companies, while laying off less, are also hiring less. This accounts for a decrease in unemployment claims. You may expect those claims to demonstrate a healing jobs market, but they more accurately reflect a bottoming out of layoff activity (not necessarily an increase in hiring).

That’s numbers and analysis  according to an article from ABC News, but here’s a different perspective: things will get better with just a little more time.

The bottom line? Some say getting thrown from the financial carousel is likely. Others are optimistically waiting for the economic ride to improve. Either way, you’ve got to ride the horse you’re on.

By the way, see this Econlife post for more information on how employment and GDP are related.

Posted by: adminEcon
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Comments (0) Add a Comment